Since I went to electronic bill pay - my finances have gotten a lot easier to keep track of. Virtually all of my vendors can be switched to my credit card for automatic payment.
I have four that can't - so I have a monthly reminder to log into their sites and view my statements - then I schedule my payments and forget about them for another month.
Yes, I could allow these vendors to simply draw on my accounts automatically but there are good reasons why I don't do this.
1 of them doesn't have this capability
1 of them is my credit card company. Since a lot of other bills get routed there - it makes a lot of sense to be on top of this bill so I can keep abreast of what is going on.
1 is the cable company. As all cable companies are b@stards - I don't allow them anywhere near my accounts.
The last is AT & (effing) T.
They are also a manual pay vendor, since there's no way to trust them.
But AT&T apparently isn't content with merely being untrustworthy - they go the extra mile to bollocks things up.
This month's reminder arrives and I log into AT&T's website and see an amount that is 60 dollars more than usual.
Naturally, I have questions about this. Clicking on the bill detail - I'm given a message that says the detail for this bill is not yet available.
Great. AT&T knows I owe them X amount of dollars, yet is unable to itemize it.
The due date is still weeks out, so I figure I'm just ahead of their system and log out. I'll try in a few days.
A few days later, I get an email that says this:
Now, in that message are two things I don't like: A bill amount that is more than usual - and a snarky message telling me to pay my past due amount immediately next to a due date that is weeks away.
Sure, I might have screwed up, so I need to see the bill detail - which is apparently ready to view.
Great
I hit their website, log in and...
Yes, I'm sure their billing dept isn't coordinated with whatever technical glitch spawned this message - but still. Settling my bill is a matter of some urgency for me - and AT&T is making this take days.
Yes, I could call them - but if I've learned one thing about AT&T in the two years I've been a customer it's this:
If you have a problem with the phone company- the absolute worst thing you can do is call them.
As AT&T goes, this is a rather small issue - but consider: I was ready to pay before they nagged me. I was especially ready to pay after they nagged me.
And now I'll wait.
Again.
Wednesday, June 02, 2010
The AT&T Experience
Tuesday, June 01, 2010
BP's Do-over
The WSJ has a solid graphic about the latest tactic BP is trying on the Deepwater Horizon blowout:
Oh, and the MMS exempted all drilling in the western and central Gulf of Mexico from having to make environmental assessments.
Yes, you heard that right.
(H/t Propublica)
Oh, and the MMS exempted all drilling in the western and central Gulf of Mexico from having to make environmental assessments.
Yes, you heard that right.
(H/t Propublica)
Labels:
Environment,
Government,
Gulf coast,
Special Kind of Stupid
Rudyard Griffiths on BP: What about all the wells that didn't have a blowout?
You have to love this guy. Rudyard Griffiths interviews Felix Salmon on the BP mess. When faced with a total catastrophe where BP is unquestionably to blame, Griffiths bravely stands up for the oppressed oil industry:
Not only that - but, it's a weak argument to point out all the wells that haven't blown up and sunk when all of these wells are not equal. Wells that operate a mile below the surface clearly pose a greater risk than those who are merely a few dozen yards underwater. The success of simpler procedures isn't a guarantee that more complicated procedures will be safe. Neither do those successful wells offer much in the way of options when a well in deep water blows up.
Take the airline analogy into this logic: Say an airline decides to save money by packing its aircraft to the gills with people and carrying the bare minimum of fuel to arrive at their destination. This ups the consequences of a disaster (more lives per plane) and increases the likelihood of a disaster (less fuel = less options like diverting in case of trouble).
Eventually this policy will result in a catastrophe. In Griffiths' world, we'd ban the airlines - but in the real world, we'd add regulation that set a maximum number of passengers and required planes to carry additional fuel.
Mr. Griffiths? Nice try - but you sound like a total idiot.
Felix Salmon: ...it doesn't make sense to blame the government for the oil spill unless you're blaming government for not regulating enough.1 out of 32,000 is clearly one too many, as Mr. Salmon points out. This is the worst oil spill in US history - don't try to act like it is offset by the fact that another well hasn't had a similar catastrophe.
Rudyard Griffiths: But, Felix c'mon. I mean, let's be a little bit fairer to what has been a fairly good record of corporate stewardship up to this point in the Gulf. I mean we're talking 32,000 wells operating in that area. Yes, a tragic, a horrific accident that we're dealing with now, but y'know is there a sense of overreach here where the media, y'know just feeds on those images of the oil pumping out into the sea and suddenly, y'know the heavy hand of government y'know clasps around the throat of a not unimportant part of an American industry that's crucial to their energy security?
Felix Salmon: I don't know what throat you're talking about here. The fact is...the question is how many layers of safeguards do you have on these wells? How certain can you be that they will not fail?
Rudyard Griffiths: Well, 1 out of 32,000 ain't too bad
Felix Salmon: Well, it looks quite bad to me. The fact is that 1 out of 32,000 is one too many, and if there is a 1 out of 32,000 chance of this happening - then you shouldn't have 32,000 wells.
Rudyard Griffiths: Airlines crash, unfortunately airliners crash every month somewhere in the world - hundreds of people die horribly. But we don't ban the airline industry. Y'know, in other words accidents unfortunately happen.
Felix Salmon: I don't think we're banning undersea drilling either.
Not only that - but, it's a weak argument to point out all the wells that haven't blown up and sunk when all of these wells are not equal. Wells that operate a mile below the surface clearly pose a greater risk than those who are merely a few dozen yards underwater. The success of simpler procedures isn't a guarantee that more complicated procedures will be safe. Neither do those successful wells offer much in the way of options when a well in deep water blows up.
Take the airline analogy into this logic: Say an airline decides to save money by packing its aircraft to the gills with people and carrying the bare minimum of fuel to arrive at their destination. This ups the consequences of a disaster (more lives per plane) and increases the likelihood of a disaster (less fuel = less options like diverting in case of trouble).
Eventually this policy will result in a catastrophe. In Griffiths' world, we'd ban the airlines - but in the real world, we'd add regulation that set a maximum number of passengers and required planes to carry additional fuel.
Mr. Griffiths? Nice try - but you sound like a total idiot.
Labels:
Environment,
Government,
Gulf coast,
Oh fer cryin' out loud,
The media
Sunday, May 30, 2010
Saturday, May 29, 2010
WSJ on Deepwater Horizon
The WSJ has a marvelous two parter that's been making the rounds.
(H/t Felix Salmon and CJR)
- BP Decisions Set Stage for Disaster
- There Was Nobody in Charge
and from the second article...Talk about hubris (emphasis mine):
"In the minutes before the Deepwater Horizon exploded, almost no one on board realized that serious trouble was brewing, other than a few men on the drilling floor—the uppermost of three levels on the massive structure. The sea was as still as glass. A cool wind blew faintly from the north. Capt. Kuchta was hosting two BP executives on board for a ceremony honoring the rig for seven years without a serious accident."
(H/t Felix Salmon and CJR)
Friday, May 28, 2010
If Corporations Were People...
Paraphrasing a perfectly apt observation I heard on the radio at lunch.
If I have a few beers before I go home and get pulled over - I get arrested. My car gets impounded. I'm out impound fees, time, and possibly bail money. Then I go to court, where I face more fines and a mark on my record that will raise my insurance rates and make it harder to get a job.
With BP, 11 people are dead and an entire region's environment and livelihood are endangered. You think anyone's going to jail for this?
Let Me Explain
E keeps telling me I should teach - I'm not sure any school would have me, but I'd certainly admit that I love explaining things.
This is an aspect of myself I have inflicted on family and friends unconsciously for decades. It only since I became a parent that I've understood what a compulsion this is for me. I watch my son explain something to me he's only just learned - from me.
He cannot help himself - because I have the same compulsion. I want to explain it, even if I just found out about it a few seconds ago. Frequently because I just found out about it a few seconds ago.
My pat line is that I'm great at explainings things - I'm but just bad at understanding things.
In my current profession - these traits get me invited to present topics to groups, and subject me to public correction.
In some settings that is a bad thing - but the overall goal is to find stuff out. I love finding things out - and there is nothing special about that quality. A moment of discovery - the instant that you realize you really understand something is a great moment.
I've said a truly sickening number of times that after I read Richard Rhodes book The Making of the Atomic Bomb I felt like I could go out and teach a class about building bombs. That's the mark of quality instruction - you end with concepts and details working together in your head.
A book is not a classroom - and despite the absence of a true instructor, I learned a ton.
What made me think about all this was listening to Salman Khan - someone who clearly enjoys explaining things even more than I do.
Khan runs the Khan Academy - a free library of online courses where he explains pretty much damn near everything.
Here he is talking about how he got started out and what he's learned about learning and teaching.
He describes the moment of discovery as an unbeatable high, you gotta love that.
I admire what he's done. A website that offers opt-in, free instruction where the end user is in total control.
He reads testimonials of people who struggled in regular classrooms, but have excelled under his instruction.
There's no one superior way to learn things - but the emergence of new techniques (or the refinement of existing ones) is just a glorious thing.
Rockin'.
This is an aspect of myself I have inflicted on family and friends unconsciously for decades. It only since I became a parent that I've understood what a compulsion this is for me. I watch my son explain something to me he's only just learned - from me.
He cannot help himself - because I have the same compulsion. I want to explain it, even if I just found out about it a few seconds ago. Frequently because I just found out about it a few seconds ago.
My pat line is that I'm great at explainings things - I'm but just bad at understanding things.
In my current profession - these traits get me invited to present topics to groups, and subject me to public correction.
In some settings that is a bad thing - but the overall goal is to find stuff out. I love finding things out - and there is nothing special about that quality. A moment of discovery - the instant that you realize you really understand something is a great moment.
I've said a truly sickening number of times that after I read Richard Rhodes book The Making of the Atomic Bomb I felt like I could go out and teach a class about building bombs. That's the mark of quality instruction - you end with concepts and details working together in your head.
A book is not a classroom - and despite the absence of a true instructor, I learned a ton.
What made me think about all this was listening to Salman Khan - someone who clearly enjoys explaining things even more than I do.
Khan runs the Khan Academy - a free library of online courses where he explains pretty much damn near everything.
Here he is talking about how he got started out and what he's learned about learning and teaching.
He describes the moment of discovery as an unbeatable high, you gotta love that.
I admire what he's done. A website that offers opt-in, free instruction where the end user is in total control.
He reads testimonials of people who struggled in regular classrooms, but have excelled under his instruction.
There's no one superior way to learn things - but the emergence of new techniques (or the refinement of existing ones) is just a glorious thing.
Rockin'.
Thursday, May 27, 2010
Right Back At You, Congressman
Emptywheel flags a lovely exchange between the Interior Secretary and Rep. Lamborn (R-Colorado). Lamborn loudly denounces finger pointing about the mess at the MMS, then proceeds to point a finger at the current administration and suggests we leave it there.
Sec. Salazar is having none of it:
This hardly makes up for the everything that has gone wrong - but it's always nice to see a Congressman called on their bullsh!t.
Sec. Salazar is having none of it:
This hardly makes up for the everything that has gone wrong - but it's always nice to see a Congressman called on their bullsh!t.
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Creepy and Cool at the Same Time
Felix Salmon posts a bit that didn't make it into his article in Wired. It's about a company named Skymeter.
Presumably tow trucks would be given these coordinates to identify people who've left their car at a given coordinate too long.
The possibilities are pretty startling - and I certainly like the idea of a world without parking meters - but I have to wonder about a system that essentially turns your parking fees into a monthly bill.
Insurance companies are using a similar technology now - pay as you go kind of insurance, with the idea that you pay for a more accurate representation of your driving habits (that hopefully works in your favor). Some company in Israel has built software that grades your driving based on how you accelerate, corner and brake. As an opt in kind of product, this allows lower risk drivers to self identify and receive lower rates. It also allows a company to screen out high risk drivers a lot easier - with higher premiums.
Makes you wonder.
The idea behind Skymeter is that they use what they call financial-grade GPS: devices in your car which are much more accurate than the GPS devices found in navigation devices or cellphones. They can tell where you are to within a few centimeters, and once you can do that, all manner of possibilities open up in terms of charging not just to get into a city center, but rather to charge by the mile or by the minute on specific streets. Raise prices where congestion is worst, keep them low where it isn’t a problem, and solve lots of other problems at the same time — like easy charging for parking (you just park your car on the side of the road and pay for however long it’s parked there) and for pay-by-the-mile insurance. Or transform the economics of something like Zipcar, which currently just charges by the hour even when charging by a combination of hours and miles would make more economic sense.
Presumably tow trucks would be given these coordinates to identify people who've left their car at a given coordinate too long.
The possibilities are pretty startling - and I certainly like the idea of a world without parking meters - but I have to wonder about a system that essentially turns your parking fees into a monthly bill.
Insurance companies are using a similar technology now - pay as you go kind of insurance, with the idea that you pay for a more accurate representation of your driving habits (that hopefully works in your favor). Some company in Israel has built software that grades your driving based on how you accelerate, corner and brake. As an opt in kind of product, this allows lower risk drivers to self identify and receive lower rates. It also allows a company to screen out high risk drivers a lot easier - with higher premiums.
Makes you wonder.
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
Random Sip From the Firehose II
- This just in: Robin Givhan is a total idiot.
- Trudy Lieberman finds USA Today knows more about health care than we do.
- Round the World: Forest Labratories makes Lexapro in the US, yet somehow manages to avoid over a third of its tax liability
- Do the shareholders lawyers know this? The Yakuza scammed Lehman brothers out of $350 million dollars
(It's in the podcast, at about 8:40 in) - Too right:The Onion says all that needs to be said about media coverage of social networking sites.
- Ryan Chittum to Wall Street: Stop acting like small banks are a problem. The money quote:
"[H]ow about putting it yet another way: There are 775 “problem banks” in the country right now, according to the FDIC. Total assets? $431 billion. Or less than one-fifth the assets of Bank of America alone. If you took all those 775 problem banks, rolled them together into a gigantic ball of suck, they’d still only be the eighth biggest bank in the country."
Labels:
Crime,
Economy,
Government,
The media,
Thieves and liars,
Yeah-what about that?
Friday, May 21, 2010
Haliburton to BP: We Blame You
Click to enlarge
Nola.com and other sources are claiming that BP had invited a testing firm called Schlumberger (SLB) to perform something called a Cement Bond Log (CBL) test in the days before the rig went nova.
In the words of Tim Probert, a Halliburton's executive, the CBL is "the only test that can really determine the actual effectiveness" of the well's seal.
For some reason, the SLB folks left the Deepwater Horizon without performing the CBL test.
The rumor mill is citing a considerably more dramatic version of events.
- SLB shows up to do test
- SLB sees oil rig is "kicking heavily", tells BP to shut down the well.
- BP does not.
- SLB asks to be taken off the rig
- BP tells them to wait for the next flight.
- SLB charters their own helocopter and leaves as soon as possible.
- Hours later the Deepwater Horizon blows up.
However, the rumor mill has a number of things wrong (Nola.com's account says the SLB folks were only on standby to perform the test, were not asked to and then left on a regularly scheduled BP flight). Nor was BP required to perform this test:
According to Probert, government regulators at the Minerals Management Service don't require a well owner like BP to order a cement bond log unless it feels uncertain about any of the earlier tests. It's not clear what the results of the positive and negative pressure tests were.But the human drama of the rumor mill would seem like a good place to start asking questions, though. Did the SLB folks see a well that was "kicking heavily?" - Did they ask to perform their test? Were they concerned for their safety or that of the rig?
Haliburton is clearly making the case they they were in the right - but their version is more information that can be used to pry more information out into the open.
We'll see what BP's response is - and if the SLB folks are willing to go on the record.
(H/t Felix Salmon)
Thursday, May 20, 2010
Pay Your Water Bill
HuffPo tells us about Vicki Valentine losing her home to foreclosure for an unpaid water bill.
The original unpaid bill amounted to $362.
However, the city had outsourced its bill collection to private companies by selling tax liens.
You'll never guess who's in the tax lien business (emphasis added):
But why did she lose her home?
Valentine was unemployed - so would have had trouble paying the original amount - but the added fees certainly didn't help.
Here's the kicker:
Quite the racket they've got going there.
You wonder it was designed before the value of real estate plummeted. Valentine's $46,000 home is currently valued at less than 20K.
Regardless of the motivation - this is government handing its job over to the unscrupulous, because its easier than doing their job.
The original unpaid bill amounted to $362.
However, the city had outsourced its bill collection to private companies by selling tax liens.
You'll never guess who's in the tax lien business (emphasis added):
Buyers range from behemoths such as JPMorgan Chase & Co, and some regional banks and law firms, to small-fry investors lured by late-night television commercials promising quick riches. Investors generally bid in an auction for the right to collect delinquent taxes and other municipal debts on property owners, sometimes by paying only a few hundred dollars. When owners can’t pay, investors can pick up property at bargain prices.Doesn't sound that bad... I mean the city gets its money saves on labor - and this woman did owe almost $400.
But why did she lose her home?
Investors...can rake in hefty profits. That’s because they can tack on fees and steep interest rates, which can amount to 18 percent annually in Baltimore.
In Valentine’s case, legal fees and other charges climbed past $3,600 – nearly 10 times her original bill.
Valentine was unemployed - so would have had trouble paying the original amount - but the added fees certainly didn't help.
Here's the kicker:
Though Valentine had no way of knowing it, some investors rigged the 2006 Baltimore tax sale auction that led to her eviction, federal prosecutors alleged in court.
The roots of that conspiracy run deep, prosecutors said. For years, a handful of Baltimore real estate lawyers and their investment partners quietly dominated Maryland tax sale auctions, with few questions asked about their bidding tactics or collection policies.
That changed after The Baltimore Sun used city records and court filings to report in March 2007 that hundreds of mainly low-income city residents had been kicked out of their homes over small unpaid bills, ranging from water and sewer charges to minor environmental citations. Some people were driven from family property because they couldn’t afford to pay thousands of dollars demanded by lien holders.
The Baltimore newspaper also documented for the first time that while dozens of parties bid in Baltimore tax auctions in 2006 and 2007, just three investment groups had won about two-thirds of the liens.
Quite the racket they've got going there.
You wonder it was designed before the value of real estate plummeted. Valentine's $46,000 home is currently valued at less than 20K.
Regardless of the motivation - this is government handing its job over to the unscrupulous, because its easier than doing their job.
Spillcam
House and Senate members have posted live camera feeds of the BP oil spill.
Below is footage taken from that feed.
(H/t E and MSNBC)
Below is footage taken from that feed.
(H/t E and MSNBC)
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
Shoving Pizzas Under the Door
Amid the latest account of how godawful the BP gulf oil mess is becoming was a great soundbite from the Coast Guard's Admiral Allen:
Oh, and (from the same NYT article)
Thad W. Allen, the Coast Guard admiral in charge of the response to the spill, said Wednesday evening that the government had decided to try to put equipment on the ocean floor to take accurate measurements. A technical team is at work devising a method, he said. “We are shoving pizzas under the door, and they are not coming out until they give us the answer,” he said.I feel better already.
Oh, and (from the same NYT article)
- The big scientific question now is what is happening in deeper water. While it is clear that water samples have been taken, the results have not been made public.
- On May 6, NOAA called attention to its role in financing the work of a small research ship called the Pelican, owned by a university consortium in Louisiana. But when scientists aboard that vessel reported over the weekend that they had discovered large plumes undersea that appeared to be made of oil droplets, NOAA criticized the results as premature and requiring further analysis.
- Under scrutiny from NOAA, the researchers have retreated to their laboratories to finish their analysis.
Before and After
This is from 2007 - but is totally worth re-visiting.
Jezebel's un-retouched cover image contest winner.
Just because this kind of evil needs to be seen in daylight. Over and over.
Until we get it.
Jezebel's un-retouched cover image contest winner.
Just because this kind of evil needs to be seen in daylight. Over and over.
Until we get it.
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
A Goddamned Shame
If I had a nickel for every time I've heard this phrase:
MP said this to illustrate the kind of question you should never ask your focus group. It's the kind of joke that gets better the more you think about it.
I worked with MP at CorpWorld before he went on to better things. This was before the purge.
I don't think I've ever met anyone who could have you thinking about their words more than MP. He'd say something and about an hour later, you'd get the joke. Frequently it would be at your expense.
MP's default setting was full-blown contempt for stupid things. CorpWorld was an environment that gave him no reason to change.
But contempt has its price - MP was deskbound because his sense of humor didn't endear him to clients who were neck deep in the kind of behavior he was making fun of.
I always thought that was a great shame - because CorpWorld so desperately needs to laugh at itself. There is so much asinine behavior going on in large organizations, it’s difficult to focus on it. You could argue I avoid doing so, just so I can function. MP was the constant reminder that much of what we did just changed the velocity of our personal hamster wheel.
Observations like that are useful, because they force you to step back and think. MP's wit was not reserved for others - User Experience designers were a favorite target.
Despite being a valid profession, user design is awash with charlatans and quacks. People whose messianic view of themselves blinds them to practical considerations. People like Dustin Curtis. They have the TRUTH, yet the world refuses to see.
I'm talking about people who self style themselves Pimpformation Architects or people like ErikDahl:
I used to be (in a very small way) one of those people. I would go into meetings as if I was there to save the world. I can save you, if you will only let me. Several large projects later - I began to understand the total tonnage of what my employers were up against.
If the back end system is a dinosaur - there's precious little that can be done on the front end. Attempts at modern UI will be hamstrung, because they expect modern middleware (that CorpWorld does not possess). MP would point this out at length.
I would always argue that we'd do the good we could - but looking back it's hard to find fault with MP's thinking. Deck chairs were rearranged, but the gash in the workflow's hull remained. The good you can do is limited by the extent to which you understand the problem.
Which is why the person who can immediately and unflinchingly identify a problem is so valuable. Unfortunately, they just don't make a lot of friends.
MP and I would email back and forth off and on. I'm terrible and keeping in contact - but MP would send informal surveys. Even sent me a birthday card - though I can't imagine how he would have found that out.
My team leader was better at keeping in touch - made it sound like MP was having trouble getting the job he wanted. That having taken his most recent leap - he felt isolated.
CorpWorld does that to people - you are plug and play components. Most meetings start with introductions "I'm so and so's replacement." Being in a room with people you know - or have known - is a rare thing.
MP had made the full blown jump, everybody was new - and his chosen specialty wasn't hiring him. It was clearly a rough ride.
But obviously I didn't know the half of it.
This morning - one of MP's coworkers emailed us to tell us the other half.
A few weeks ago, MP was up for a big job interview and was preparing like mad. He'd done mock interviews to prepare and (as always) did so without notes. MP is brilliant that way. The stuff he's interested in, he knows inside out and backwards.
MP could be acerbic, but his intelligence and drive are unmistakable. Surely no employer could miss that.
However the interview went - MP clearly was not satisfied. He went home and called family to say it had not gone well.
Then nothing for two days.
I don't have the specifics - but it is abundantly clear that shortly after his interview, MP killed himself.
I started looking for the details before realizing that they would do no good.
The world has one less bright and funny person.
I'd said before that there are things that are immune to all reason.
This is one of them.
This interface was designed by my grandmother. She died last week. Do you like it?I'd have exactly one nickel, courtesy of a former coworker, MP.
MP said this to illustrate the kind of question you should never ask your focus group. It's the kind of joke that gets better the more you think about it.
I worked with MP at CorpWorld before he went on to better things. This was before the purge.
I don't think I've ever met anyone who could have you thinking about their words more than MP. He'd say something and about an hour later, you'd get the joke. Frequently it would be at your expense.
MP's default setting was full-blown contempt for stupid things. CorpWorld was an environment that gave him no reason to change.
But contempt has its price - MP was deskbound because his sense of humor didn't endear him to clients who were neck deep in the kind of behavior he was making fun of.
I always thought that was a great shame - because CorpWorld so desperately needs to laugh at itself. There is so much asinine behavior going on in large organizations, it’s difficult to focus on it. You could argue I avoid doing so, just so I can function. MP was the constant reminder that much of what we did just changed the velocity of our personal hamster wheel.
Observations like that are useful, because they force you to step back and think. MP's wit was not reserved for others - User Experience designers were a favorite target.
Despite being a valid profession, user design is awash with charlatans and quacks. People whose messianic view of themselves blinds them to practical considerations. People like Dustin Curtis. They have the TRUTH, yet the world refuses to see.
I'm talking about people who self style themselves Pimpformation Architects or people like ErikDahl:
"I am equally at home in the worlds of theory and praxis, I often lull myself to sleep at night with thoughts about cultural-semiotics, information bricolage, theories and implications of the social self, as well as concepts of "social-themeparking."MP's commentary:
I fail to embrace the UX community in part because of the showy, self-important, self-promoting types littered across the Internet with titles like "user experience guru" and "passionate user experience advocate." ...off the top of my head, I don't know any developers who parade around the Internet as "object-oriented guru" and "passionate regex God."That kind of pushback is useful. Instructive, even.
I used to be (in a very small way) one of those people. I would go into meetings as if I was there to save the world. I can save you, if you will only let me. Several large projects later - I began to understand the total tonnage of what my employers were up against.
If the back end system is a dinosaur - there's precious little that can be done on the front end. Attempts at modern UI will be hamstrung, because they expect modern middleware (that CorpWorld does not possess). MP would point this out at length.
[Central application] doesn't run web services... none of what we'll want is possible until this changes.
I would always argue that we'd do the good we could - but looking back it's hard to find fault with MP's thinking. Deck chairs were rearranged, but the gash in the workflow's hull remained. The good you can do is limited by the extent to which you understand the problem.
Which is why the person who can immediately and unflinchingly identify a problem is so valuable. Unfortunately, they just don't make a lot of friends.
MP and I would email back and forth off and on. I'm terrible and keeping in contact - but MP would send informal surveys. Even sent me a birthday card - though I can't imagine how he would have found that out.
My team leader was better at keeping in touch - made it sound like MP was having trouble getting the job he wanted. That having taken his most recent leap - he felt isolated.
CorpWorld does that to people - you are plug and play components. Most meetings start with introductions "I'm so and so's replacement." Being in a room with people you know - or have known - is a rare thing.
MP had made the full blown jump, everybody was new - and his chosen specialty wasn't hiring him. It was clearly a rough ride.
But obviously I didn't know the half of it.
This morning - one of MP's coworkers emailed us to tell us the other half.
A few weeks ago, MP was up for a big job interview and was preparing like mad. He'd done mock interviews to prepare and (as always) did so without notes. MP is brilliant that way. The stuff he's interested in, he knows inside out and backwards.
MP could be acerbic, but his intelligence and drive are unmistakable. Surely no employer could miss that.
However the interview went - MP clearly was not satisfied. He went home and called family to say it had not gone well.
Then nothing for two days.
I don't have the specifics - but it is abundantly clear that shortly after his interview, MP killed himself.
I started looking for the details before realizing that they would do no good.
The world has one less bright and funny person.
I'd said before that there are things that are immune to all reason.
This is one of them.
Green, Clean & Dirty
The Daily Green lists 15 foods worth buying organic
(This is based on the amount of pesticides found on representative samples of this type of food, as well as the food's tendency to retain chemicals it comes into contact with.)
(Their UI sucks so hard, I'm listing the items for easy reference. You want the whys and methodology, you'll have to endure their stupid slide show)
(H/t Newsweek)
(This is based on the amount of pesticides found on representative samples of this type of food, as well as the food's tendency to retain chemicals it comes into contact with.)
- Meat
- Milk
- Coffee
- Celery
- Peaches
- Strawberries
- Apples
- Blueberries "one of the dirtiest berries on the market"
- Nectarines
- Bell Peppers
- Spinach
- Kale
- Cherries
- Potatoes
- Grapes
- Onion
- Avocados
- Sweet Corn
- Pineapple
- Mango
- Asparagus
- Sweet Peas
- Kiwi
- Cabbage
- Eggplant
- Papaya
- Watermelon
- Broccoli
- Tomatoes
- Sweet Potatoes
(Their UI sucks so hard, I'm listing the items for easy reference. You want the whys and methodology, you'll have to endure their stupid slide show)
(H/t Newsweek)
History, As Told By Texas and Arizona
Chauncey DeVega posts a what if timeline of US history to showcase the idiocy that is the Texas Education Board.
That's the funny version. The reality would only be amusing if it wasn't going to pass.
And here's a sample of their idiocy:
I'm remembering those utter dorkwads from the Dover School district getting the stuffing beaten out of them. So perhaps there's hope.
In the meantime, I'm sure I know what Dr. Plait would say: Texas: Doomed.
(H/t JK)
That's the funny version. The reality would only be amusing if it wasn't going to pass.
[Cynthia Dunbar] is one of a clutch of Christian evangelists and social conservatives who have grasped control of the state's education board. This week they are expected to force through a new curriculum that is likely to shift what millions of American schoolchildren far beyond Texas learn about their history.Here's a live blog of the vote of the Texas Education Agency:
The board is to vote on a sweeping purge of alleged liberal bias in Texas school textbooks in favour of what Dunbar says really matters: a belief in America as a nation chosen by God as a beacon to the world, and free enterprise as the cornerstone of liberty and democracy.
...There seems to have been a move away from a patriotic ideology. There seems to be a denial that this was a nation founded under God. We had to go back and make some corrections."
And here's a sample of their idiocy:
12:15 – ...The Texas State Board of Education has stricken from the standards references to “capitalism” and “free market” because the board’s right-wingers think “capitalism” is a negative term. The only permitted term for such an economic system will be “free enterprise.” We wouldn’t believe this if we hadn’t just watched it happen. This is so stupid it makes our head hurt.I have to believe that while it is relatively easy for a deranged group of lunatics to seize control of state agency for a short time - rational thought will push back with a vengeance.
12:28 – Board member Mavis Knight offers the following amendment: “examine the reasons the Founding Fathers protected religious freedom in America by barring government from promoting or disfavoring any particular religion over all others.” Knight points out that students should understand that the Founders believed religious freedom was so important that they insisted on separation of church and state.
12:32 – Board member Cynthia Dunbar argues that the Founders didn’t intend for separation of church and state in America. And she’s off on a long lecture about why the Founders intended to promote religion. She calls this amendment “not historically accurate.”
12:35 – Knight’s amendment fails on a straight party-line vote, 5-10. Republicans vote no, Democrats vote yes.
12:38 – Let the word go out here: The Texas State Board of Education today refused to require that students learn that the Constitution prevents the U.S. government from promoting one religion over all others. They voted to lie to students by omission.
Here was the amendment again: “examine the reasons the Founding Fathers protected religious freedom in America by barring government from promoting or disfavoring any particular religion over all others.” And this board, on a vote of 10-5, said they don’t want Texas students to learn about this basic protection for the religious freedom of everyone in America.
I'm remembering those utter dorkwads from the Dover School district getting the stuffing beaten out of them. So perhaps there's hope.
In the meantime, I'm sure I know what Dr. Plait would say: Texas: Doomed.
(H/t JK)
Labels:
Gobsmacked,
Government,
Science,
Special Kind of Stupid
Monday, May 17, 2010
Deepwater in Big Pictures
Boston.com's The Big Picture does the Gulf oil disaster:
Blobs of oil from the massive spill float on the surface of the water on May 5, 2010
in Breton and Chandeleur sounds off the coast of Louisiana. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
Blobs of oil from the massive spill float on the surface of the water on May 5, 2010
in Breton and Chandeleur sounds off the coast of Louisiana. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
Eavesdrop on Your Cell? No. Kill You? Yes.
Greg Marx runs through some tepid coverage of the Obama administration's decision to authorize the extrajudicial killing of Anwar al-Awlaki, an American citizen accused of fomenting terrorist violence.
Here's the money quote:
I can't imagine that the Obama administration's proposed solution can stand up to legal scrutiy.
I get that a total bar on deliberate attacks on Americans can result in some crazy situations
-High value foreign target pals around with nobody American for protection
-US troops encounter a known American fighter on the battlefield and are not allowed to call in airstrikes or artillery.
You would think that military rules of engagement could deal with most of these situations - - but the idea that the US can deliberately assassinate an American without some kind of external check is about as contrary to the idea of secure in ones person as you can get.
This sh!t's gotta stop.
Here's the money quote:
To eavesdrop on the terrorism suspect who was added to the target list, the American-born radical cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, who is hiding in Yemen, intelligence agencies would have to get a court warrant. But designating him for death, as C.I.A. officials did early this year with the National Security Council’s approval, required no judicial review.I'd have to agree.
“Congress has protected Awlaki’s cellphone calls,” said Vicki Divoll, a former C.I.A. lawyer who now teaches at the United States Naval Academy. “But it has not provided any protections for his life. That makes no sense.”
I can't imagine that the Obama administration's proposed solution can stand up to legal scrutiy.
I get that a total bar on deliberate attacks on Americans can result in some crazy situations
-High value foreign target pals around with nobody American for protection
-US troops encounter a known American fighter on the battlefield and are not allowed to call in airstrikes or artillery.
You would think that military rules of engagement could deal with most of these situations - - but the idea that the US can deliberately assassinate an American without some kind of external check is about as contrary to the idea of secure in ones person as you can get.
This sh!t's gotta stop.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



