Wednesday, December 19, 2007

A senseless and empty thing

This was going to be a review of a radio show.

Today I listened to perhaps the worst episode of This American Life I've ever heard. It was about chickens, so you know it was pointless. Worse, each essay was rooted in the kind of elitist left-wing crapfest that –

Skip it.

That's what I was going to write about. How normally This American Life can be so brilliant (like their episode about Nauru) and then suck so immeasurably. I was going to call it "The exception that proves the rule."

Great, eh?

Then I went to the next episode, called "How to Rest in Peace."

-and then I spent an inordinate amount of time in a gas station restroom trying to get my collective sh!t back together.

The intro was a woman whose father was murdered when she was 10. She detailed her feelings of isolation – resenting our murder-as-entertainment culture, any number of straightforward observations about her experience with her dad's death.

She related an encounter with the mother of a murdered child – a woman who had devoted her life to pursuing her child's killers. This mother wanted to help this woman find the killers of her dad.

The mother's mindset, while perfectly understandable, is portrayed as being completely alien to the narrating woman's experience. She had no interest in pursing her father's killer. In fact she hoped that it would be impossible – so that she would be free of that obligation.

The way she put it – her dad's murderers, in jail or at large, had no bearing and no relevance when it came to how she felt about her dad.

This was the intro.

I extracted the obvious parallels from her story – but whatever. It's just a show, right?

Act I was Jason Minter. A man who was investigating the horrifying murder of his mother.

I can't do justice to the story, so if you haven't heard it – go to their website and listen.

Essentially, when he was six and his sister was three - his mother and another woman were murdered in the next room during a botched break-in and robbery. The killers were caught and will spend decades in jail.

The story is related realtime since (of course) Jason is making a documentary about his life.

The horror of this particular crime would have washed over me a few years ago. I would have lapped it up like the people vilified earlier in the show for hosting a murder-themed party.

I just cannot get past what this man was doing. He was re-investigating a solved crime. His reaction to visiting the crime scene cannot be overstated. He has no emotion, and he desperately wants some. His sister cries, but he does not. Even when confronted with crime scene photographs of his dead mother – shot in the head – his reaction is muted and self-conscious. He knows he should be emotional – realizes that he isn't, and he expresses his curiosity about it.

That is not how I am these days.

I remember when my grandfather died. Specifically, when my father called to tell me – I felt absolutely nothing. I was that way for days. It was like someone had told me the score to a sporting event that I couldn’t care less about.

"Oh."

I truly thought something was wrong with me. Right up until the funeral. Dad's reaction at that funeral, well that was the end of any stoicism I might have had.

This man was trying to reach that point – where he could feel something about what had happened. Something beyond the clinical recitation of facts. Something to hold on to.

Mr. Minter had a theory that there was some hidden motive in the death of his mother. That the monstrous crime that had irreparably damaged his family's lives had originated in something other than random chance.

This is where I started losing track of things.

I think this is the problem I've had for two years plus.

On the day I was hired, my boss had said, "things happen for a reason."

My boss is a good person, optimistic. I like them.

-But when they said that, I had the most visceral impulse so say something. More than an impulse, really a vision of what I would say and exactly how I would say it.

"In my experience," I would say, "there are things that are immune to all reason."

These words have reappeared on countless occasions in my head demanding to be said. There has been no real opportunity to say them, and surely there never will be. They would always be inappropriate and this blog is perhaps the only venue where they can be let out.

And they are so inadequate as to be a joke.

When Mr. Minter meets with one of the men involved with his mother's murder, he gets a first person narrative that leaves little doubt that his conspiratorial theory about his mother's murder has no basis in fact.
When pressed, even Jason admits there's not much evidence to back him up. Still, it's easy to understand the allure of the idea that the crimes weren't just a random incident. Imagine going through life not just knowing, but really knowing that your life could implode in the worst possible way at any moment.

Imagine internalizing the notion that every little decision, like driving over the neighbor's house to drop off a friend could put you in the path of disaster.
He is clutching at threads.

Because however little comfort it would be, it would still be comforting to know that what happened to his mother was unavoidable. That it was deliberate and calculated. That is didn't just happen out of the blue.

He knows his theory is virtually groundless – and he pursues it anyway because it is better than the alternative.

I'm in a gas station when I'm hearing this. Buds in and pretending to read the newspaper.

I only have that meaningless alternative.

Yet somehow part of me is dying to do what this man has done. Pursue something that is a mystery only to me.

Dad's death was an accident. There are no killers to pursue, prosecute or execute. There are no motives or hidden agendas. No purpose.

He fell.

So I've been told.

The sum of what I know about that day was related to me in two conversations: the cell call from mom on the day he died – and eavesdropping on my mom telling grandma what happened.

Since asking mom for more detail is impossible – good God, how could you even begin that conversation? I'd imagine speaking to the neighbor who gave my dad CPR.

I've imagined speaking to the EMTs, as if they'd remember anything. Like this event would have had any effect on them. Just another in a long list of DOAs.

The entire time I'd been listening to Mr. Minter's story I'd been comforting myself with the thought that he's crazy. But I know the impulse, and were circumstances only slightly different – I could easily go down the same path.

It wasn't so long ago that a chance conversation with my mom had me writing judges in pursuit of my great-grandfather's treatment history and insane record.

The unpalatable truth is what I am dancing around.

Dad died doing something he'd done countless times before. Something he didn't have to do – if it hadn't been for the goddamned storm. If he'd waited for the county to do it, if he'd worn a goddamned helmet-

He died for no reason at all.

I am so unbelievably furious about this and there is no useful target to aim at.

I'm ignoring the show now, vacantly looking towards my newspaper.

The only alternative I can think of is to study the minutiae of dad's death to avoid the subject.

About the time I've worked through how I'm going to start asking which people for what information, I realize I need to get the hell away from people since I'm about to start looking like a crazy person.

Next thing I know, I'm in the bathroom, and somebody's jiggling the doorknob.

I don't have a windout for this - and there doesn't appear to be much in the way of solutions. But the purpose of this thing was always to allow me to scream into the void.

So I do, if only because it seems more rational than the other things I can think of.

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

I'm not a believer, but

Glenn Greenwald is saying things that are nice to hear. A whole bunch of Americans reared up, faced towards Washington and screamed "No!"
...both prongs of the White House's FISA demands -- increased surveillance powers and telecom immunity -- seemed to be an absolute fait accompli. It would all follow the same depressing pattern we've seen all year long whereby the President easily gets everything he demands from the Congress.

Thus, the usual roster of obedient establishment propagandists -- the David Igantius's and Fred Hiatts and Joe Kleins -- dutifully lined up (as always) to support the White House's demands, explaining condescendingly to the masses how Important it was for their Safety that telecoms receive something the masses would never get: immunity from having deliberately broken our laws for years. They further insisted that when the telecoms and high government officials broke our laws, it was only because they were acting patriotically, doing this all for our own Good (without mentioning that they were profiting immensely in the process). By that point, nobody other than blogs, the ACLU, EFF, and similar groups were paying the slightest attention to this lobbyist-led, bipartisan establishment scheme, which was well on its way to being implemented.

* * * *

But that's when something truly significant happened. The idea for a Dodd "hold" on telecom immunity spontaneously arose in several places on the morning of October 18, when the Cheney/Rockefeller deal was announced.

...
Without question, it was those efforts, spontaneously created and driven by blogs and their readers, which led directly to the principled stand Chris Dodd took yesterday in defense of the rule of law. This was not a process whereby some Beltway politician announced a campaign and then citizens fell into line behind it. The opposite occurred. The very idea for the "hold" originated among a few citizens, was almost immediately exploded into a virtual movement by tens of thousands of people, and was then made into a reality by a single political figure, Chris Dodd, responding to that passion by taking the lead on it.
Glenn links to a video of Sen. Dodd saying exactly that.

It's refreshing to think that deals that are only popular among the beltway crowd cannot withstand the spotlight of public scrutiny.

We ought to have more spotlights.

Yes, the cynic in me would admit that this is temporary, and that Dodd can afford to make this stand because his is not a frontrunner. But look at the opposing sides and then look at the scoreline. This should be over already - it should have been a blowout.

As it is, we're going into extra time.

I know without checking this blog's Google stats that this blog had nothing to do with it - but bloggers and blog readers played a big part in making this happen.

It's a good thing. Virtual grassroots! Using the very infrastructure the Telcos provide us to deny them immunity for their past misdeeds.

Invigorating, but kinda makes Net Neutrality seem like a bigger deal, no?

Monday, December 17, 2007

Pulling up from the brink

Whaddaya know? Sen. Reid blinked.

I still can't figure how he would advance such a bill, or how his local newspapers wouldn't crucify him for doing it - but at least there's another month for opponents of telco immunity to gear up.

In January, I expect this same stupid bill to do the rounds again - if only because there appears to be some sort of Democratic reflex arc when the President says jump.

"How high? Mr. President, sir?"

Sen. Dodd will claim credit - and he's welcome to it.

Late Edit: From Sen. Dodd's remarks in the Senate via GG and ThinkProgress:
in place of the forthright argument and judicial deliberation that ought to be this country’s pride, two simple words from our president’s mouth: “Trust me.”

I cannot speak for my colleagues–but I would never take that offer, not even in the best of times, not even from a perfect president. I would never take that offer because our Constitution tells us that the president’s word is subject to the oversight of the Congress and the deliberation of the courts; and because I took an oath to defend the Constitution; and because I stand by my oath.

“Trust me.” It is the offer to hide ourselves in the waiting arms of the rule of men. And in these threatened times, that offer has never seemed more seductive. The rule of law has rarely been so fragile.

“It is a universal truth that the loss of liberty at home is to be charged to the provisions against danger…from abroad.” James Madison, the father of our Constitution, made that prediction more than two centuries ago. With the passage of this bill, his words would be one step closer to coming true. So it has never been more essential that we lend our voices to the law, and speak on its behalf.

On its behalf, we say to President Bush that a nation of truly free men and women would never take “trust me” for an answer, not even from a perfect president — and certainly not from him. […]

If this disastrous war has taught us anything, it is that the Senate must never again stack such a momentous decision on such a weak foundation of fact.
Rock on, Senator. Wish I lived in a state with a meaningful primary - I'd gladly vote for you.

---

Whatever machinations caused Sen. Reid to pull the plug - I'm hoping the media can shine an uncomfortably bright light on him in the interval.

Questions I'd like him to answer:

Sen. Reid:
  • You had two versions of this bill - one with immunity and one without. Despite widespread opposition within your own party - you've advanced the bill that includes the immunity provision - how do you justify this decision?

  • Your party was swept into power by an electorate that was clearly disillusioned with this administration. How do you respond to your constituents who question your willingness to acquiesce to a request from this same administration?

  • You've upheld the holds on legislation for numerous GOP senators, how do you explain why you brought this bill to the floor, despite Sen. Dodd's publicly declared hold on the bill? Can you list another occasion when you've overridden the hold of a fellow senator?
With any luck, Sen. Rockefeller will get a similar grilling - as to why he's been such an advocate for immunity and the position of this administration.

I mean, with friends like these....

Leadership, as opposed to playing one on TV

Sen. Chris Dodd, whatever his shortcomings as a presidential candidate - has stood up to be counted on the FISA telco immunity bill issue.

From TPM:
On a conference call with reporters just moments ago, Chris Dodd's deputy campaign manager, Amos Hochstein, just vowed that the Senator will filibuster the Senate FISA bill containing telecom immunity later this afternoon for as long as he possibly can hold out.

"He will speak as long as he can," Hochstein said. "He will speak until he can no longer."
I'm not entirely certain how this squares with this afternoon's cloture vote of 76-10 in favor of ending debate, but Dodd has vowed to lead the charge against the current bill.

I would hope that this would put pressure on the other Democratic candidates to put their differences aside, go to Washington as a group and stop this bill. It would be an opportunity to actually DO SOMETHING and contrast themselves with the GOP field.

The house has voted against immunity, but I'm wondering if conference committee chicanery will get immunity in.

Somebody ought to call out Sen. Reid. Sit in his office. Pitch a fit and get on the news. This guy's backstabbing the very constituency that put him in power.

Arrrgh!

...for sale and doomed to quick destruction, if it should ever find a buyer

Sen. Harry Reid is selling us out.

As Glenn Greenwald points out - Sen. Reid is actually stacking the decks so that Telco immunity can pass the senate easily.

Sen. Dodd is going to filibuster this bill, with help from Sens. Feingold and Kennedy - but it's an open question as to how long this will last - and if the cloture vote will get through.

Call your senators. Email your senators. Tell them this bill must be stripped of any immunity provisions.

We lose this one, and any public inquiry into what is being done ends. This administration and the telcos get away with it.

Glenn posts a comment that I'd wish I'd written from holly-go-lightly:
...here the Senate stands, poised to grant immunity to telecommunications companies for profiting from the warrantless and lawless spying perpetrated upon the law-abiding citizenry; here the Senate stands, poised to usurp the judiciary, the branch of government responsible for determining whether the laws of the land have been broken and meting out punishment where appropriate; and here the Senate stands, poised to usher in its own irrevelancy -- and, worst of all, in exchange for nothing: no promises that this flagrant lawbreaking will cease, no testimony to be offered in the course of real and rigorous investigation.

...

You who purport to lead, yet cower like beaten dogs before the President, as if he were king. You who vote upon legislation you likely don't even read. You who coif your hair into absurd, unmoving helmets and whiten your teeth and don designers suits and appear on TV, daring to tell me you represent my interests. You who pass pointless, meaningless resolutions condemning commercials and congratulating professional sports teams for winning while Americans go hungry, while Americans go without healthcare, while Americans work two jobs to make ends meet, while Americans die in Iraq and Afghanistan. You who swear an oath to support and defend the Constitution and flatter yourselves by conflating your re-election with the interests of your country and constituency. You who fret about keeping your powder dry until the are barracks overrun.

...

And so here is the Senate in all its majesty. Where are the Patrick Henrys, the Benjamin Franklins? God save America from her greatest enemy: a pack of pathetic, self-serving cowards.
Damn right.

Friday, December 14, 2007

Dead to rights

Years ago, I published a parody website that got me in trouble with my former employers. The essay that got me in the hottest water was a story titled "Unpleasant Subject Avoided at All-Staff Meeting." The story had a firm footing in reality, but the joke was that the article did just what it lambasted management for doing; it didn't mention the unpleasant subject.

I think this subtlety eluded management at first. When I finally 'fessed up to management about writing the article, I'd pointed out the joke and instantly felt the tension go out of the room. The managers had been mad at what they'd thought I'd said, instead of what I actually had. I got a sheepish grin instead of a tongue-lashing.

Later, I was invited back by the same manager to sample (of all things) some music that took a similar tack of generic-language humor. It was a CD by a group called Da Vinci's Notebook. There was a lot to love on the CD, but the priceless bit was a parody of pretty much all ballads ever written called Title of the Song.

Title of the Song is a description of all the stereotypical ingredients of a love ballad – set to music. A brilliant and thorough skewering of the entire genre.

I laughed my butt off in the manager's office – it was hilarious. I duped a copy to my work computer and listened to it for the rest of the day.

Eventually I swapped computers and lost my stored copy – but I assumed I'd be able to get a copy in any store or on iTunes.

And I couldn't – these guys had no web presence – at least not then. Totally pissed me off. I'd have bought the CD if I could find it. I'd given up on finding them. Obviously - I quit too soon.

Today, Sivacracy has found them – and you can hear the music online or even watch the video. I'd do the audio first, their lyrics and delivery are better than the visuals.

Here's hoping their musical send up of Disney, "Kingdom of the Sky" is out there as well.

Thanks, Siva! I'd totally forgotten about these guys.

Late edit: I clearly should have Google-ed these guys before now. Watch this video (Not Safe for Work)

Where does the money go? (encore)

You wanna know where the government is spending your tax dollars?

Look it up.

Yeah, the long awaited project of a searchable database of Federal spending is a reality - as of today.

SoooooO, for example - how much money did we spend on Blackwater in FY2007?


Yeah - that's a good thing. Kudos to the people who made this happen.

Now all we need is a similar website to track earmarks.

Shine the light, and watch the cockroaches run....

I know how you feel, kid...

Thursday, December 13, 2007

Black bag job

If you want to assess how good or bad a particular moving experience is – all you need to do is look at the moving boxes. When people schlep their stuff from place to place, what they use to do it says a lot about how things are going.

In our case, our boxes chart a kind of life cycle.

In the beginning we had new boxes.
They were purchased in bulk. Two sizes, with packing paper and a tape gun. Sharpies were always available, and were used to write detailed descriptions of their contents.

Things like:
Kitchen. Pottery & drinking glasses. Fragile. This side up.
This would be written on more than one side of the box, so that some label would be visible when the box had things stacked on it.

Subsequent boxes in this happy stage would be similarly labeled, before being lovingly stacked in nice straight columns.

That was last week.

With the deadline for getting out of the house fast approaching, expedience trumped any desire for clear labeling.
Kitchen stuff
Cmp Rm
Flurgen Blurg
Break it if you want, who cares which side is the top and we might have copied the label onto the side – maybe.

In due course, the packing paper was used up – we began using newspaper, plastic bags, bath towels, and finally - loose clothing from the floor.

Then the box supply ran out.

Not to worry. Since we are moving things to the apartment as well as storage – any box at the apartment can be reused.

These boxes already had labels, so these must now be changed:
Kitchen. Pottery & drinking glasses. Fragile. This side up.
Becomes
Kitchen. Pottery & drinking glasses. Fragile. This side up.
Bks
Usually when moving, you miss the odd item or two. When this occurs repeatedly in room after room, it becomes impossible to group and box similar items together:
Computer To Apt Shoe, Garden tools, Blender parts
Shortly after this happens – there is a realization that labeling boxes that are destined for the apartment (which will be emptied and re-used) is less than essential:
Random Crap. Apt.
Then the packing tape runs out. Undoubtedly more is available (we certainly remember buying more) but it cannot be located.

Speed!

There is a brief period of tucking box tabs under each other to "close" boxes – but this only lasts until the looming deadline of date-we-must-be-out crystallizes in our minds.

We shift to plastic tubs.

They'd been used since the beginning – but we'd held onto the illusion that what was put in them would STAY in them much longer than we had with the boxes.

Now, we dump out the tubs and the apartment and lug them back to the house. These tubs have labels on them – carefully written on masking tape:
LittleBean's toys. To Apartment.
Since the tubs are now filled with hangars and unmatched shoes – we peel off the tape.

Despite their size, the tubs are soon overwhelmed by the volume of crap. Their size also makes them quite heavy.

We move to garbage cans.

I've yet to be involved in a move that has not reached the stage when stuff is unceremoniously dumped into garbage cans to "pack" it.

Appliances, more shoes and (put a bullet in my head now)- wire hangars.

As only a few garbage cans in any house have real size, they are filled up almost immediately. One (the recyclable bin in the garage) has been sitting in the 18-degree weather for days and shatters as it is being picked up.
Side note: Only GIANT IDIOTS move in the wintertime.

Addendum: We'll be moving again in February or March.
At this stage we have abandoned boxes, tubs and random plastic containers and have arrived at the crack cocaine of moving containers: the black plastic trash bag.

Now, anyone with a few minutes could reel off a list of reasons to never use trash bags in packing:
  • They break open
  • Pointy things poke through them
  • They do not stack
  • People might mistake a full trash back for (duh) trash and act accordingly
  • They break open
At this stage, there are no minutes to consider these facts. The thought process resembles this:

Crap. Need thing to carry it. Bag! More crap. Put in bag!

-and so on.

Net result of all of this is an abomination of items stuffed into the back of a mini van to the point that (when you finally open the door) it vomits out onto the pavement like the extra-chunky result of a pub crawl.

Plus some of it was fragile (lucky it was already in a garbage bag, eh?)

This takes care of the stuff you wanted to keep.

Now for the stuff you wish you'd never owned in the first place.

1-800-GOT-JUNK is step one. Point at it and it disappears. Yes, you have to write them a check, but this late in the game- you're practically hugging the guy as he takes away the plastic faux-closet and pressboard desk.

Cha-ching. Vroom. Gone.

What remains are the move's problem children: hangars, old curtain rods, toxic chemicals, paint, a propane tank, and a VAST selection of loose and unidentified objects.

The truly toxic items will get routed for proper disposal; the empty propane tank gets stuffed into a storage container.

And the rest?

Black. Plastic. Bag.

Old glass vases, empty storage jars, a ferocious tangle of hangars are shoved into bags. When those bags split, their ruptured carcasses are themselves stuffed into bags.

Tomorrow is trash day, but the legal trash bin is full to overflowing and the bag count is dangerously close to landfill territory.

Layer the minivan in cardboard – everything goes in the back.

An hour of slinging and flinging and the van is packed solid. There are no sightlines behind the driver seat – but it's all in the van.

It's night. It's butt-cold and I have a van full of garbage and recyclables.

Hit it.

--

I've groused about rentals before, and I'm sure I will again – but there is one thing rental complexes have that makes the current situation bearable:

Unlocked dumpsters.

I am sure no resident would be allowed to unload this much garbage if they asked – so I'm not asking.

Pull into the underground parking, wheel the dumpster over to the van. Fling fling, fling. I'm blocking the entrance, I'm wondering if they have surveillance, I'm trying to think of what I'll say if they watch me throw a 40lb bag of mulch into the dumpster.

No one shows. I push the bin back to its original position and leave no trace I was ever there (well, except for the 40 bags of garbage).

My back feels like it's been beaten with a pipe – but the house is all but empty.

Cue the Mission Impossible theme – I was never here.

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

I'm sure this will all work out in the end

About the time that we are all but moved into our new place and all but out of our old place - the offer on the Tatanka house was accepted.

This will mean that we have between two and three months of purgatory before we can resume our roles as debt-ridden homeowners.

Which is not to say that the rental is a waste - it was absolutely going to happen with or without the offer going through - now we know that it will be over sooner rather than later.

In the meantime, we're re-learning the joys of rental property:
  • Second-guessing decisions about putting nails into the walls.
  • The inability to fix/replace minor items that annoy the crap out of you (like ruined door-stoppers).
  • Mapping which plugs be relied on and which plugs are controlled by a wall switches.
  • Lugging the trash down to a communal dumpster that is forty yards from my door and behind a locked door. (Always fun in 18 degree weather)
  • A drive-up mailbox (with a key) that is sixty yards from my front door (also fun in 18-degree weather)
  • Heat that (while free) purges the house of all moisture and makes you start every morning on the verge of a hangover.
  • Giving my new address to the same pizza company we've been writing checks to for years and being told that "we don't take checks."
  • A washer and dryer whose capacities are barely adequate for a pygmy living alone at a nudist camp.
The endgame puts us in a big house for the right price (barring horrific defects like last time), so I suppose I should suck it up - but I'd forgotten what I'd hated so much about renting.

Bring on March.

Yet another meme for your overstuffed brain

Via lifehacker:

How to fold a T-shirt in two seconds:




Fold A Shirt In 2 Seconds - video powered by Metacafe


Okay, that's totally slick.

What got me onto this was the discussion of How to fold a fitted sheet - a technique that was demonstrated to me by some random woman I met in a laundromat.

She was positively evangelical about it - but it was so cool, that E and I found ourselves demonstrating the same technique to her amused relatives less than a week later.

Kinda gives credence to that whole 'ideas are viral' theory.

Monday, December 10, 2007

109 bucks, 42 minutes on the phone, and 78 hours

This is what it costs to transfer internet and phone service from one address to another.

Thanks so much AT&T.

You're all we've come to expect from Telcos.

Friday, December 07, 2007

Purgatory

End of an era and I just can't muster the energy to care.

Six and a half years in this house and we move tomorrow.

The mad scramble of packing will give way to the mad scramble to keep ahead of the movers. I need to take down the computer and disassemble the desk so they can haul it away. Don't know if the drill's charged, still have crap in the desk.

It's a mess.

I've taken three van-loads of crap over to our temporary housing - an apartment whose only quality was availability. Price maybe, but since we're renting furniture, the end result is that we are equaling our mortgage payment between structure and amenities.

Baby E gets her own room though, so I suppose that's more bang for the buck.

Zero neighborhood, though. A collection of things I'd forgotten since I'd last rented. Scrambling for parking - neighbors who are self-absorbed twenty nothings.

Shitty electric ranges - washer and dryer that scream "cheap" - lovely view of a nearby highway.

There's a pool. I'm sure we'll be using that in the next few months.

The offer on the house bounced back as a counter. This house (I'll call it Tatanka) makes the Big House look like an outhouse. Freakin' huge - dated decor. Not the home run house for either of us, but it would be a major step up in quality of life in pretty much every category.

Plus, it'd be near where we are now. We wouldn't need to abandon what we love about this neighborhood.

The seller of Tatanka has thrown in some odd conditions: they want us to plunk down more in earnest money, they want to cap how much we'd be paying per month to finance the house (weird) and they have a few items we'll need an interpreter for.

We'll see. Once we've truly jumped into this lovely apartment - it's not like we'll need to move until June. No hurry.

Oh, cell reception is actually WORSE at the apartment than it is in my current house (which is saying something - our house is like a Faraday cage).

Neighborhood walks will be a thing of the past and E will become a commuter. The kids and I get to be closer to our daily destinations, but I'm not looking forward to being out in boon-effing-nowhere.

Tomorrow, the movers will show up with containers. It's like PODs, only with moving help. It's a new wrinkle for me, but if it works, this may actually be cheaper than regular movers and fit our needs better.

I just hope we can avoid having trash bags of stuff being flung into containers at the last minute. The classic "observe our shit not being together" moment. We're both so shredded, I can hardly imagine tomorrow being worse.

But of course it will be. The snow will make moving things more difficult. The guy we hired to clear our snow did our driveway with a bobcat - and our walk with a garden spade.

Assuming people survive the walk to the driveway, they should be fine.

And it will snow tomorrow - so that should be nice.

The kids will be shuttled off to their cousin's house. My brother in law is driving down to pick them up (only family would do that - they've been such a help, I'm totally embarrassed. We've never been in much of a position to help them. Jen and her husband always seem to have their act together.)

The Boy does NOT want to go to his cousins - but every time we pick him up, he's having a total blast - so I'm sure this is just his age coming out. Baby E couldn't care one way or the other - not after the first fifteen minutes or so.

I just think The Boy is a little overwhelmed by all of this. He gets so little say in so many of his daily activities - I'm sure he's frustrated. The next few days he's going to have even less input. "Go to your cousins, we'll meet you later. Don't touch that. You can't have that, it's going to storage."

I just don't know - he's going to go to a different place with a different room, with a subset of his stuff. He won't be able to play outside (the neighborhood bites) and anyway it's cold as F---. Mom and dad are freaking out most times, and are happy to park him in front of the TV.

We need a house, we need more space, we need a neighborhood.

Mostly - we just need a break.

Wednesday, December 05, 2007

WaPo, WaPo, how far hast thou fallen?

Okay, there's all sorts of criticism out there for the Perry Bacon's WaPo hatchet job on Obama - but CJR's Paul McLeary has the best rejoinder yet:

I’m just going to let [Washington Post's Assistant Managing Editor, Bill] Hamilton hang himself here [with his defense of the story]:
The paper’s intention, Hamilton said, was “to write a story about the kind of rumors that are out there,” and added that “saying something is a rumor is not saying it’s true.”

“We didn’t say it was a false rumor,” Hamilton added. “To me, a rumor is not true.”
With reasoning like that at the top of the editorial food chain, it looks like our job is going to be done for us this campaign season.

Mr. Hamilton? You need to stop talking to the press. Better still, you need to stop working for the press.

Son, can I speak to your parents?

Easily the most disturbing photograph I've seen today...

NIE

Yes, I know about the NIE.
No, I won't be posting about it, because every time I think about how we've been assured that Iran is going to nuke us 'til we glow - I begin smashing things.

Here's a picture of a bunny with a pancake on its head:

Wisdom of old age

This is over a year old, but Guy Kawasaki posted something that makes a hell of a lot of sense.

Along the lines of the "Wear Sunscreen" speech, it's a top ten list of ways to live well:
Hindsights

Speaking to you today marks a milestone in my life. I am fifty years old. Thirty-two or years ago, when I was in your seat, I never, ever thought I would be fifty years old.

The implications of being your speaker frightens me. For one thing, when a fifty year old geezer spoke at my baccalaureate ceremony, he was about the last person I'd believe. I have no intention of giving you the boring speech that you are dreading. This speech will be short, sweet, and not boring.

I am going to talk about hindsights today. Hindsights that I've accumulated in the thirty-two years from where you are to where I am. Don't blindly believe me. Don't take what I say as “truth.” Just listen. Perhaps my experience can help you out a tiny bit.

I will present them ala David Letterman. Yes, fifty year old people can still stay up past 11:00 pm.

#10: Live off your parents as long as possible.

I was a diligent Oriental in high school and college. I took college-level classes and earned college-level credits. I rushed through college in 3 1/2 years. I never traveled or took time off because I thought it wouldn't prepare me for work and it would delay my graduation.

Frankly, I blew it.

You are going to work the rest of your lives, so don't be in a rush to start. Stretch out your college education. Now is the time to suck life into your lungs-before you have a mortgage, kids, and car payments.

Take whole semesters off to travel overseas. Take jobs and internships that pay less money or no money. Investigate your passions on your parent's nickel. Or dime. Or quarter. Or dollar. Your goal should be to extend college to at least six years.

Delay, as long as possible, the inevitable entry into the workplace and a lifetime of servitude to bozos who know less than you do, but who make more money. Your parents and grand parents worked very hard to get you and your family to this point. Do not deprive them of the pleasure of supporting you.

#9 Pursue joy, not happiness.

This is probably the hardest lesson of all to learn. It probably seems to you that the goal in life is to be “happy.” Oh, you maybe have to sacrifice and study and work hard, but, by and large, happiness should be predictable.

Nice house. Nice car. Nice material things.

Take my word for it, happiness is temporary and fleeting. Joy, by contrast, is unpredictable. It comes from pursuing interests and passions that do not obviously result in happiness.

Pursuing joy, not happiness will translate into one thing over the next few years for you: Study what you love. This may also not be popular with parents. When I went to college, I was “marketing driven.” It's also an Oriental thing.

I looked at what fields had the greatest job opportunities and prepared myself for them. This was stupid. There are so many ways to make a living in the world, it doesn't matter that you've taken all the “right” courses. I don't think one person on the original Macintosh team had a classic “computer science” degree.

You parents have a responsibility in this area. Don't force your kids to follow in your footsteps or to live your dreams. My father was a senator in Hawaii. His dream was to be a lawyer, but he only had a high school education. He wanted me to be a lawyer.

For him, I went to law school. For me, I quit after two weeks. I view this a terrific validation of my inherent intelligence. And when I quit, neither of my parents were angry. They loved me all just the same.

#8: Challenge the known and embrace the unknown.

One of the biggest mistakes you can make in life is to accept the known and resist the unknown. You should, in fact, do exactly the opposite: challenge the known and embrace the unknown.

Let me tell you a short story about ice. In the late 1800s there was a thriving ice industry in the Northeast. Companies would cut blocks of ice from frozen lakes and ponds and sell them around the world. The largest single shipment was 200 tons that was shipped to India. 100 tons got there unmelted, but this was enough to make a profit.

These ice harvesters, however, were put out of business by companies that invented mechanical ice makers. It was no longer necessary to cut and ship ice because companies could make it in any city during any season.

These ice makers, however, were put out of business by refrigerator companies. If it was convenient to make ice at a manufacturing plant, imagine how much better it was to make ice and create cold storage in everyone's home.

You would think that the ice harvesters would see the advantages of ice making and adopt this technology. However, all they could think about was the known: better saws, better storage, better transportation.

Then you would think that the ice makers would see the advantages of refrigerators and adopt this technology. The truth is that the ice harvesters couldn't embrace the unknown and jump their curve to the next curve.

Challenge the known and embrace the unknown, or you'll be like the ice harvester and ice makers.

#7: Learn to speak a foreign language, play a musical instrument, and play non-contact sports.

Learn a foreign language. I studied Latin in high school because I thought it would help me increase my vocabulary. It did, but trust me when I tell you it's very difficult to have a conversation in Latin today other than at the Vatican. And despite all my efforts, the Pope has yet to call for my advice. Latin has proven to be very valuable, but a “live” language would be nice too.

Learn to play a musical instrument. My only connection to music today is that I was named after Guy Lombardo. Trust me: it's better than being named after Guy's brother, Carmen. Playing a musical instrument could be with me now and stay with me forever. Instead, I have to buy CDs at Tower.

I played football. I loved football. Football is macho. I was a middle linebacker--arguably, one of the most macho position in a macho game. But you should also learn to play a sport like hockey, basketball, or tennis. That is, a sport you can play when you're over the hill.

It will be as difficult when you're 50 to get twenty-two guys together in a stadium to play football as it is to have a conversation in Latin, but all the people who wore cute, white tennis outfits can still play tennis. And all the macho football players are sitting around watching television and drinking beer.

#6: Continue to learn.

Learning is a process not an event. I thought learning would be over when I got my degree. It's not true. You should never stop learning. Indeed, it gets easier to learn once you're out of school because it's easier to see the relevance of why you need to learn.

You're learning in a structured, dedicated environment right now. On your parents' nickel. But don't confuse school and learning. You can go to school and not learn a thing. You can also learn a tremendous amount without school.

#5: Learn to like yourself or change yourself until you can like yourself.

I know a forty year old woman who was a drug addict. She is a mother of three. She traced the start of her drug addiction to smoking dope in high school.

I'm not going to lecture you about not taking drugs. Hey, I smoked dope in high school. Unlike Bill Clinton, I inhaled. Also unlike Bill Clinton, I exhaled.

This woman told me that she started taking drugs because she hated herself when she was sober. She did not like drugs so much as much as she hated herself. Drugs were not the cause though she thought they were the solution.

She turned her life around only after she realized that she was in a downward spiral. Fix your problem. Fix your life. Then you won't need to take drugs. Drugs are neither the solution nor the problem.

Frankly, smoking, drugs, alcohol--and using an IBM PC--are signs of stupidity. End of discussion.

#4: Don't get married too soon.

I got married when I was thirty two. That's about the right age. Until you're about that age, you may not know who you are. You also may not know who you're marrying.

I don't know one person who got married too late. I know many people who got married too young. If you do decide to get married, just keep in mind that you need to accept the person for what he or she is right now.

#3: Play to win and win to play.

Playing to win is one of the finest things you can do. It enables you to fulfill your potential. It enables you to improve the world and, conveniently, develop high expectations for everyone else too.

And what if you lose? Just make sure you lose while trying something grand. Avinash Dixit, an economics professor at Princeton, and Barry Nalebuff, an economics and management professor at the Yale School of Organization and Management, say it this way:

“If you are going to fail, you might as well fail at a difficult task. Failure causes others to downgrade their expectations of you in the future. The seriousness of this problem depends on what you attempt.”

In its purest form, winning becomes a means, not an end, to improve yourself and your competition.

Winning is also a means to play again. The unexamined life may not be worth living, but the unlived life is not worth examining. The rewards of winning--money, power, satisfaction, and self-confidence--should not be squandered.

Thus, in addition to playing to win, you have a second, more important obligation: To compete again to the depth and breadth and height that your soul can reach. Ultimately, your greatest competition is yourself.

#2: Obey the absolutes.

Playing to win, however, does not mean playing dirty. As you grow older and older, you will find that things change from absolute to relative. When you were very young, it was absolutely wrong to lie, cheat, or steal. As you get older, and particularly when you enter the workforce, you will be tempted by the “system” to think in relative terms. “I made more money.” “I have a nicer car.” “I went on a better vacation.”

Worse, “I didn't cheat as much on my taxes as my partner.” “I just have a few drinks. I don't take cocaine.” “I don't pad my expense reports as much as others.”

This is completely wrong. Preserve and obey the absolutes as much as you can. If you never lie, cheat, or steal, you will never have to remember who you lied to, how you cheated, and what you stole.

There absolutely are absolute rights and wrongs.

#1: Enjoy your family and friends before they are gone.

This is the most important hindsight. It doesn't need much explanation. I'll just repeat it: Enjoy your family and friends before they are gone. Nothing-not money, power, or fame-can replace your family and friends or bring them back once they are gone. Our greatest joy has been our baby, and I predict that children will bring you the greatest joy in your lives--especially if they graduate from college in four years.

And now, I'm going to give you one extra hindsight because I've probably cost your parents thousands of dollars today. It's something that I hate to admit too.

By and large, the older you get, the more you're going to realize that your parents were right. More and more-until finally, you become your parents. I know you're all saying, “Yeah, right.” Mark my words.

Remember these ten things: if just one of them helps you helps just one of you, this speech will have been a success

Tuesday, December 04, 2007

And… the hits just keep on comin'

From CJR, commentary on the scandals over at The New Republic and National Review Online:

NRO Joins TNR in Walk of Shame
Another day, another reporter making stuff up
By Paul McLeary

It looks like war-time fabrication isn’t just the domain of The New Republic anymore. The National Review’s W. Thomas Smith, a regular contributor and author of the magazine’s milblog The Tank, has been caught reporting fabrications fed to him by sources during a trip to Lebanon this fall. According to several critics—and Smith and the NRO themselves—Smith fell for the falsehoods his sources fed him completely, without ever bothering to try to corroborate or confirm them independently, while making it sound like he had witnessed more than he really had.
So, let's reflect a bit. You have Time magazine allowing Joe Klein to assert as fact items that are demonstrably false. When this is demonstrated, the Klein responds with "I have neither the time nor the inclination to determine who is right."

Then you have The National Review and The New Republic unquestioningly gobbling up Thomas Smith's every pronouncement when even rudimentary fact-checking would have shown his stories to be exaggerations or outright fabrications.

Al Franken was half right – The bias in media isn't just liberal/conservative – it's a lazy bias – but the lazy is applied to the ideas they are sure of. The ones they doubt, they will do their homework so you can crucify the opposition.

Lt. Col. Bob Bateman has it exactly right:
…what seems to have happened at the core of this issue was an editor’s willing suspension of disbelief because fact-checking was either “too hard” or because the storyline fit within their own vision of reality.
Or both.

B students of the world, unite!

On Moneymaking's Jon Morrow, via brazencareerist:

Twentysomething: Why I regret getting straight A’s in college

By Jon Morrow - I nearly killed myself in college to get straight A’s. Well, almost straight A’s. I graduated with 37 A’s and 3 B’s for a GPA of 3.921. At the time, I thought I was hot stuff. Now I wonder if it wasn’t a waste of time. Let me explain...
Yeah. What he said.

Take that, overachievers!

Monday, December 03, 2007

Murphy's Law as applied to the cellular age

Just a quick observation:

It used to be, that if you had to reach a person by phone – Murphy's Law would merely arrange that the person is unavailable at whatever moment you chose to call. It was the one and only rule of important phone calls – they end with a machine telling you "Blah, blah blah, I'll call you back." (Shorthanded below as BBBICYB).

With the advent of cellular phones, the playful paw of fortune has many new ways to screw with you.

As luck would have it, I have explored most of them over the past few days. We're trying to find a place to live between the time when we have to leave the house we just sold and when we move into whatever house we eventually find.

If we find a place.

Here's just a sampling - I call and leave a message, and the person calls me back when:

  • I am in a cellular dead spot.

    • "Mr… uds…bordup…rental…avail… [dial tone]"
    • *Return call*
    • BBBICYB
  • I am in a business meeting.

    • [Ring]
    • *hit 'forward to VM' *
    • *Get voicemail*
    • *Return call*
    • BBBICYB

  • I have my cell in a pants pocket while driving:
    • [Ring]
    • *contort*
    • *swerve*
    • [Ring]
    • *pull over*
    • *contort*
    • *hit 'forward to VM' by accident*
    • *Get voicemail*
    • *Return call*
    • BBBICYB

  • I am parked on the side of a busy road, with my infant daughter in one arm
    • "Hello?"
    • "Hi this is-"
    • [Deafening roar of passing truck]
    • "-today?"
    • "I'm sorry, could you repea-"
    • [Screaming baby]
    • "-time hearing-"
    • [Passing car without muffler]
    • *Nearly drop baby*
    • "Damnit!"
    • [Upside-down screaming baby]
    • "Did I get you at a bad-"
    • *Drop phone*
    • *Put baby in car seat*
    • *Look for phone under car*
    • *Pick up phone.*
    • "-so I'll call you back."
    • "Okay"
    • [Dial tone]
    • *Resume life, restore order*
    • *Return call*
    • BBBICYB

Twice now, I've experienced Murphy's best attempt at irony:

I’m at work and make the initial call and "blah, blah blah, I'll call you back." I wait, at my comfortable desk, with perfect cell reception during a day when I have no meeting scheduled.

Later in the day I experience - let's just call it "severe gastro-intestinal distress" – and end up camped out in a bathroom stall. Murphy is a true bastard because the extended duration of my stay gives me time to contemplate how each passing moment would be a really bad time for -

[Ring]

Now – Murphy's got his rule and I've got mine when it comes to calls in the bathroom: I don't care if it's God Almighty on the line, he's gettin' voicemail.

You wanna reach me in the bathroom-you'd better send a pillar of fire.

At this point, I would hope Murphy has played out his fiendish energies – but with three more callbacks pending, I'm not optimistic.

Late edit:

Just added a call-waiting scenario:

On the phone with my adorable son and [Boop, Boop] call waiting kicks in. Must get son off the phone in mid babble, so I can pick up.

Can't make it. Miss call. Ugh.

Thursday, November 29, 2007

You can set your watch by them

As soon as Obama pulls even with Hillary in Iowa, the right wing smear machine fixes him in their sights.

Is Perry Bacon Serious?
Obama story has no place in the Washington Post
By Paul McLeary
Columbia Journalism Review

In The Washington Post this morning, reporter Perry Bacon Jr. wrote what may be the single worst campaign ‘08 piece to appear in any American newspaper so far this election cycle.

In the front-page piece, Bacon muses over how the chances of Barack Obama getting elected president might be affected by the fact that he’s not Muslim. Seriously. To build his case, Bacon stumbles artlessly through all manner of rumor, innuendo, and xenophobic smear—never bothering to refute any of it, even though there is plenty of well-documented evidence to knock down much of this stuff.
On the one hand, how pathetic and sad is that? On the other had, how does a campaign rebut these allegations without giving them staying power?

Here's hoping Obama's campaign folks are more imaginative than I am.

Tearing Time a new one

Time magazine's Joe Klein appears to have been caught parroting partisan talking points (and representing them as fact), and Glenn Greenwald is raking him, his editors and his magazine over the coals.

A perfect example of how a media outlet can grow complacent and fail its readers.

Get some popcorn. Glenn's kickin' ass.

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

If highway signs were written like software is documented..

Caution: This sign has very sharp edges. Do not touch the edges of this sign. Also, the bridge is out ahead.

Slow news day? You wish

Here's ABC News.com's Top Headlines as of five minutes ago:


I'd argue there is a single substantive headline in there, the one about Home Sales.

You could stretch the teddy bear story if the woman is a foreign national risking prison time in Sudan - but really, that's better slotted under 'News of the weird.'

Network news: sparing no expense to bring you Bionic Cats, Dancing With the Stars, and Teddy Bear dramas.

What a colossal waste of time.

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

We pay the highest prices for prescription drugs in the world

Just got through reading an NYT article, Dr. Drug Rep, where a doctor recruited by the drug companies slowly realizes their corrupting influence.

It is not news that drug companies send reps to doctors urging them to proscribe their product.

It is not news that these same reps recruit and pay doctors to promote their product to other doctors.

And it should come as no surprise that doctors who take money from Big Pharma are less inclined to speak ill of them or their products.

But this little tidbit struck me as a bit new: doctors who shill for Big Pharma are given detailed dossiers on their attendees so that they can single out lucrative practitioners for extra attention.
A note from another rep reminded me of a scene from “Mission: Impossible.” “Dr. Carlat: Our main target, Dr. , is an internist. He spreads his usage among three antidepressants, Celexa, Zoloft and Paxil, at about 25-30 percent each. He is currently using about 6 percent Effexor XR. Our access is very challenging with lunches six months out.” This doctor’s schedule of lunches was filled with reps from other companies; it would be vital to make our sales visit count.

Naïve as I was, I found myself astonished at the level of detail that drug companies were able to acquire about doctors’ prescribing habits. I asked my reps about it; they told me that they received printouts tracking local doctors’ prescriptions every week. The process is called “prescription data-mining,” in which specialized pharmacy-information companies (like IMS Health and Verispan) buy prescription data from local pharmacies, repackage it, then sell it to pharmaceutical companies.
Got that? Big Pharma gets weekly updates on who prescribes what. Then they can target their marketing efforts and get feedback on what tactics are working with types of doctors, or even specific doctors.

But isn't there some kind of safeguard for this data? I mean, doesn't it seem odd that pharmacies would divulge the prescription habits of a given doctor?

Funnily enough, there is. Pharmacies don't usually release doctor's names with their data.

So, how do they know which doctor prescribes what? Easy, the AMA tells them:
The American Medical Association is also a key player in prescription data-mining. Pharmacies typically will not release doctors’ names to the data-mining companies, but they will release their Drug Enforcement Agency numbers. The A.M.A. licenses its file of U.S. physicians, allowing the data-mining companies to match up D.E.A. numbers to specific physicians. The A.M.A. makes millions in information-leasing money.
Those millions are paid by Big Pharma, and ultimately by you and me.

That's nice.

You mean, all that insistence on network-specific devices was all hooey?

Having exhausted all other options, Verizon takes the first step towards doing the right thing:

Verizon Wireless Says ‘Bring Your Own’ Device
By Saul Hansell

Verizon Wireless has stunned the wireless world by announcing that by sometime next year it will open its network to “any apps, any device.”

There is a lot of fine print, but the essence appears to be that Verizon will offer two flavors of service: its traditional bundle, which typically includes a subsidy for phone purchase and various other features, and “bring your own” device service, which will be open to any device that meets “minimum technical standards.”


'Bout freaking time. Now maybe the other Telcos can get off the dime and get back to selling access, instead of phones and accesories.

Y'know, kinda like the rest of the world does?

The rise of Plastic Man

Josh Marshall is looking at the data over at Pollster.com and is discovering something:

Mitt Romney's trending better in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina than anyone else.

It fits with his early start and huge bankroll. The forces that drive campaigns appear to have committed hard to Romney in the early contests - and they've purchased the infrastructure to push their brand harder than anyone else can afford to.

Giuliani's big push is in New Hampshire (where his numbers are all wobbly), but he is clearly on the downslope in the other two states. He's hoping to win backers by an upset in New Hampshire, but we've seen that movie before. McCain beat Bush but all he won were headlines - and Bush's backers bought South Carolina and dusted off the brass knuckles.

Speaking of McCain, his trends look worse than anyone - no one else had so far to fall.

Huckabee is a stunt, even if he wins Iowa or finishes a strong second, no way he's got the staying power to soak up the beating he's going to get in New Hampshire and Carolina.

Whoever sticks their head up is just going to be the first one Romney's push pollers go after.

I'm betting we have Romney as the GOP nominee. Let's hope the Dems aren't squeamish about pointing out what an unprincipled tool he is.

Late edit:

-Which of course, begs the natural question - who is trending better for the Dems in these states?

Iowa looks pretty close, New Hampshire has Hillary way up, with Obama trending up, and South Carolina shows Hillary surging, with Obama looking pretty stagnant.

First glance, Hillary looks to take two of these states, Obama might get Iowa and could get some juice from that to carry a second.

One clear loser in all of these states is John Edwards. His numbers are sliding in all three.
Bridesmaid time agan, eh John?

Darn shame.

Monday, November 26, 2007

The sky is falling

Growing up, I had what I thought was a typically fatal assessment of the world I was going to inherit.

I have a vivid 1980 recollection of my friends and I all agreeing that the world would end in nuclear holocaust. This was assumed by all to be fact in the same way that we assumed that one day we would all have to get jobs and pay taxes. Oh sure, it would be dreadful, but it was so far off – and besides, what could be done about it?

Thankfully, we were only right about jobs and taxes.

The new looming catastrophe (aside from our nation's incessant flirting with despotism) is financial. The country will go broke.

This has affected me in a similar fashion. I know that this is a tangible possibility, but it will happen decades from now. Besides, politicians have been stupid for generations, what in the world can be done about it?

Heck, it might not even be real – I mean, if the country really was in dire financial straits, wouldn't somebody be sounding the alarm?

Quick scans of Election 2008™ doesn't show any serious coverage. Opinion polls don't list anything like "Country going broke," but list Jobs/Economy a distant third behind Iraq and health care.

We either don't know, don't care, or both.

Enter the GAO, the Government Accountability Office.
Their April report entitled The Nation’s Long-Term Fiscal Outlook (PDF) lays out some pretty appalling data.

Their first talking point:

The Bottom Line: Federal Fiscal Policy Remains Unsustainable

(the alternate scenario is letting the Bush tax cuts expire, the baseline extended assumes they do not)

The report also shows comparisons of what federal spending will look like over time as expressed in percentages of the Gross Domestic Product.

Here's the vanilla scenario: The Bush tax cuts are allowed to expire and revenue (as a share of the GDP) increases through 2017 because of bracket creep, more taxpayers being subject to the AMT and more revenue from tax-deferred retirement accounts (presumably due to larger numbers of retirees taking out their tax-deferred money).

Here's what that looks like:

Okay, that sucks rocks.

Now here's the same time interval with the Bush tax cuts extended and the AMT exemption amount retained at the 2006 level through 2017.

That sucks even harder.

Wow, who'd have thought that lowering our tax revenue would adversely affect our national financial picture?

The GAO, in its usual antiseptic prose, spells out what is new about this report:
Despite some improvement in the near-term projections for Social Security and Medicare, the long-term outlook has not changed: it remains unsustainable.
So here we are, hell bent on winning the war on anyone the administration targets – while behind us the country is quietly going broke.

It would be a gross misstatement to say that this is the fault of one administration – a series of presidents have been unwilling to tell the public that they will have to pay more or get less.

However, the Bush tax cuts will hasten our financial ruin – and we need to challenge any and all candidates for national office to ask them what the hell they plan to do with our country.

RIP Anastasia

There is the oh-so-faint possibility that we can finally get rid of one of those enduring mysteries.

Amateurs Unravel Russia's Last Royal Mystery

YEKATERINBURG, Russia — On the outskirts of this burly industrial center, off a road like any other, on a nowhere scrap of land — here unfolded the final act of one of the last century’s most momentous events.

The new remains were 70 yards from the first burial site.

...It would be 73 more years, in 1991, before the remains would be reclaimed and the announcement would ring out: the grave of the last Russian czar, Nicholas II, and his family had been found.

But the story does not end there.
Yes, the story doesn't end there - an unabashed charlatan named Anna Anderson and mankind's unquenchable thirst for conspiracy have fueled 90 years of speculation that Anastasia and her brother managed to survive.

At long last - it appears that they have found their bodies, not far from where they found the rest of the Romanovs.

Let us hope that DNA is salvageable.

Perhaps then we can stop hearing fairy tales about how two unarmed and isolated young children managed to escape (or be spared by) the same group of murderous thugs who shot and stabbed nine other adults and children to death, before disfiguring them with acid and throwing them down a mine shaft along with several hand grenades.

It would make a great story for them to have survived, but pitiless men like Lenin insist that their assassins be thorough - or at least too terrified to disappoint.

Brutal as it is, the truth would at last make the Russians provide the very least that is owed to murdered children: a grave that testifies to posterity the manner of their death.

Both barrels

Digby's friend Deep Insight has written a lengthy essay on the current state of the upcoming election. Worth a read in it's entirety, but there are three items I'd expound on:

…Bush has a 25% approval rating. There is absolutely no political price in opposing the initiatives of the GOP.
Yes, Goddammit – and it's about time the Democrats realized that the next time the administration makes a "demand," they can actually improve their image simply by holding a press conference and saying "No."

They need to take Feinstein, Schumer, and Rockefeller to the woodshed and inform them that cozying up to the administration is not what their constituents are demanding. Smarter observers than I am have pointed out repeatedly that Congressional approval ratings are low not because of all the bills left unsigned, but because of the bills they have signed.

The GOP base hates them because they are democrats, but the democratic base is incensed because they haven't stopped the president.

2006 was a clear message to slam on the brakes, and we are still rolling downhill.

Memo to democrats in congress:

1) Refuse to put administration bills to a vote – and publicly declare why you are doing so.
2) Force the GOP in congress to stop your legislation and denounce them for doing so until they relent.

The number of times that the GOP is able to block legislation and the headline reads "Democrats fail to get the votes," is just appalling. They need to get the message out that the bills are being blocked by the GOP – not because it's good politics, but because people don't know the bills are being blocked.

When your approval rating is as low as the GOP, why should they now get a pass on their bad behavior? Put the spotlight on them and see how they run.
Before a single vote is cast, the pundit class has awarded the Democratic nomination to Hillary Clinton. The Republicans are already running against her, and McCain has an attack ad up of dancing hippies at Woodstock (one more time let’s go back to 1969). Certainly, she is in a commanding position with plenty of money and universal name identification. She remains the favorite, and the press has even decided it is time to harass her.
I was going to post a screed on why I fear Hillary Clinton, but most of what I'd say is pretty much in Deep Insight's post. Why is it assumed that she will be the nominee? I know Obama is now polling ahead in the recent ABC poll, but where on earth did we get the idea that these early numbers are going to predict Iowa? Iowa was where Howard Dean met an untimely death at the hands of "captain charisma" John Kerry. It's a freaking crapshoot – viability thresholds and gamesmanship can play havoc with the pollsters' shiny numbers.

Hillary Clinton is the wet dream candidate for the GOP.

Here they are getting pummeled in the polls, independents aren't breaking for them and GOP voters crossing the aisle is a real possibility.

What candidate ensures that no GOP voter will hold their nose and vote democratic?
What candidate can give even the left-leaning independents pause?
What candidate does the GOP have attack ads already in the can for?
What candidate will calcify feelings of 'nothing changes in Washington, so why bother?' in democratic voters?

Hillary, Hillary, Hillary and Hillary in that order.

You can see it in any Fox-crafted talking point – they're happy to presume the results of the primaries, and plant the sense of inevitability in the minds of people everywhere. It's going to be her, so why go to the polls?

She's got an early poll lead, and we all know what those are worth. I'm hoping people don't stay home. New Hampshire, Iowa? You stay home, you just voted for the winner – and you've no right to grouse.

George Bush should be tied so tightly around the Republican candidates' necks they can hardly breathe. Every quote of support, every vote, every word of worship should be thrown in their faces and there is a ton of it. He is the most unpopular president, for the longest sustained time, of any president in history. He is the modern Herbert Hoover, a man whose name should become an epithet.
A-freaking-men. The sycophants need to be shown the error of their ways. Play their every soundbite from June 2003 until they beg you to stop. Then show footage of them hugging the president as he stumps for them in 2004.

There are plenty of Dems who fell into this camp as well, and I wouldn't spare them, either. You had the opportunity to be counted and you bowed to the administration. You made the call, you pay the price.

I'm fine with allowing the GOP to pretend that George W. Bush never happened, so long as their public declarations are demonstrated to be false in an equally public setting. Let them try, but the Bush albatross has landed squarely on them.

They earned it.

Friday, November 23, 2007

Release the hounds!

It's official, the Big House is gone. The Seller is sticking to their number in defiance of all market forces and common sense.

Their reply was especially pithy: "Such is life... We can appreciate that [you cannot afford our home]."

Well, thanks.

Back to the house hunt.

Thursday, November 22, 2007

Happy Thanksgiving

TPM gives thanks for the following displays of government ineptitude (not that they happened, but that they happened on tape):



In other news, Happy Thanksgiving everyone!

Cloudkookooland

When you immerse yourself in something, it's easy to lose perspective.

So it is with the Big House.

Having been up to our necks in contingencies, financing papers, inspection reports, defects, amendments, counter-amendments - and the phalanx of details that would accompany us to an eventual closing, we'd missed one important fact.

The seller is nuts.

Their response to our latest wish list demonstrates that, sagging market and mandatory defect cures aside, they have a number - and they won't budge.

It would appear that having immersed themselves in every little detail of their house for the past decade, they have stopped seeing the flaws and only see its assessed value.

A prior item they agreed to is now off the table - they're foisting it off to us and lowering the price in "exchange." With the eight grand reduction in price we are expected to rewire the house, replace the roof/sunroof/rain gutters, install a new furnace, and remove their asbestos.

Obviously, this is not going to happen.

We will re-offer our list with the one concession we can afford to make, but its pretty clear that this deal is DOA.

We have to be out of our current house in less than three weeks, so right after the holidays, we're going to start arranging for temporary living quarters.

To some extent, I'm relieved that the contractor/escrow logistics aren't going to happen - but in the back of my mind I'm still living in an updated house in the neighborhood I wanted.

*hands over ears*

LaLaLaLaLaLa... LaLaLaLaLaLa...

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

What are they thinking...?

Got this one from atrios

Top 10 articles for November 2007 on Wikipedia.org?
1. Main Page
2. Wiki
3. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows
4. Naruto
5. Guitar Hero III: Legends of Rock
6. United States
7. Wikipedia
8. Deaths in 2007
9. Heroes (TV series)
10. Transformers (film)
Top 10 most viewed articles on Conservapedia? (as of today, at least)
1. Main Page‎ [1,911,665]
2. Homosexuality‎ [1,583,687]
3. Homosexuality and Hepatitis‎ [517,326]
4. Homosexuality and Promiscuity‎ [421,028]
5. Gay Bowel Syndrome‎ [393,647]
6. Homosexuality and Parasites‎ [388,439]
7. Homosexuality and Domestic Violence‎ [373,125]
8. Homosexuality and Gonorrhea‎ [331,654]
9. Homosexuality and Mental Health‎ [292,635]
10. Homosexual Agenda‎ [270,323]
True, this isn't exactly an apples-to-apples comparison, but still

- that's pretty damn funny.

Chilling effect

A while back, I got in trouble at my job for making a parody website spoofing where I worked.
I'd put together a set of articles that shamed no one, but were basically distopian views of office work.

The reaction by management was not good. Rather than stick to my guns, I folded the website. A man's gotta eat.

In one of the discussions I had with the higher ups, this point was made:
Whatever my intent, the true meaning of what I'd done resided in the audience.
In other words - the audience's reaction is what my words meant.

After careful consideration, I've come to the conclusion that this point of view is total crap.

What got me going strolling down this memory late was this post on CNet:
Bloggers beware: You're liable to commit libel by Steve Tobak

...As for me, I'm planning to play it safe. I mean, how hard can it be to say nice things about people?
It would be an oversimplification of what Mr. Tobak is arguing to say that he wants people to stop posting things that are not so nice, but I can't help but have a belligerent reaction to his article:

What do you mean I can't post whatever the hell I want on my blog? It's a blog! Opinion, posted! Deal with it!

I am sure that the everyone-is-published reality brings more people under the rules of publishing, but surely there is a place to distinguish a private blogger's opinion from the claptrap of nationally published blowhards like Robert Novak.

If jerks like Novak can out our spies and publish hearsay innuendo without prosecution, I would think the blogosphere needn't restrain themselves too much.

Unbe-effing-lievable

TPM found a sure recipe for stunned silence:
As you know, soldiers often get bonuses for signing up for new hitches in the service. But some of them now aren't able to complete the period of enlistment because some have had limbs blown off and sustained other injuries. So the Pentagon's asking them to cough up those bonuses for not fulfilling their commitments.
Yeah.

The same military that couldn't account for 2.3 trillion dollars, is cutting costs on signing bonuses for injured soldiers.

Against all odds, I think we've finally found Americans who do, in fact - hate the troops.

They work in the Pentagon's payroll office.

Late edit:

I thought dm's comment on TPM was particularly apt:
Dear Disabled Veteran,

Unfortunately, due to the fact that you obeyed orders from the U.S. Government to go to the foreign war zone in which you were severely wounded, you are in material breach of your contract to obey the U.S. Government. We, the U.S. Government, therefore demand restitution on behalf of the hard-working taxpayers whom you have so heartlessly defrauded.

Sincerely,
The US Army

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

The art of the deal

I suck at this.

Negotiations, I mean. I can read people pretty well, I just have a dangerous habit of empathizing with the other side.

I sell myself out.

So, here we are. House negotiations, week two. The Big House has many, many sins.

We are asking the seller to come to Jesus. We're just not sure that's going to happen. Understandably, people resent begin told that they have been living in a place that is unsafe. They do not appreciate having to pay for all their deferred maintenance in one fell swoop.

Yet they must.

There is the yankback quality of accepting an offer and thinking you are in the clear – and then the inspection lands on you like a ton of bricks.

In this case, perhaps two tons. I empathize. I truly do. This would not be fun for anyone. The market is kicking seller's butts (lord knows, my butt is still smarting from what happened to us) and to add a stack of cures into an offer that is already down from the market is – well, depressing.

It's not even that we're doing the hardball thing. The items we have listed are items that our creditors and insurance company will insist on. They will make us escrow funds for them. 150% of the estimates to fix them will get hoovered up into non-interest earning accounts. We will pay to finance them.

This will suck.

And still, we persist in our offer. Bow down before the Big House. It commands you. You must submit.

Am I totally insane?

If all goes well, the seller will agree. Then the real pain begins.

There will be timelines. We must correct these items in 30 days or we will be dropped by our insurance.

The bank is drawing up a list. Our all-too-thorough inspection is in their hands and they have demands. Oh yes, many, many demands….

What if the estimates are off? What if we need the extra funds in escrow? What if the market tanks and eats our mutual funds?

Easy. We'll be living under an overpass.

Even with that, the back of my mind is trying to figure out the nicest way to ask the seller to gut their expectations so that we can keep moving forward.

Our buyer's agent has been a star – keeping us (keeping me) from doing foolish things like "here's the most I can pay" ("Okay, then pay that." *Doh!*).

At the back of all this is the notion that if this falls through, we are out of our home in less than a month. If we thought our current setup was cramped and stressful, apartments will make our current house seem spacious.

We have had two years of unrelenting stress. If this goes deal goes through, we'll have sixty days of unrelenting logistical hell. Movers, contractors, estimates, bankers…All the while, money is flying out the window.

If this happens, I'm never moving again.

Waiter? Normal life, please.

A tale of two feedbacks

In the mad scramble for a house, I've had to touch base with our insurance company many times. I've hit them up for a financial advisor and there was the need for some secure two way communication.

Normally, this would be a recipe for disaster.

However, my insurance company is USAA. This link (and this one) pretty much spell out what that means. If you look, USSA is at the bottom of each of those tables – but if you read their customer satisfaction ratings, they kick everyone else's ass.

They get relegated to the bottom of the table partly because they only serve the military and their families – and partly to make the other insurance companies feel better.

'cos – let's face it – most of them suck.

I'd offer up the user experience at Washington Mutual.

A user with a simple (and very common) need, had difficulty getting what they wanted, and tried to tell them about it.

Obviously, it did not go well with WaMu.

Take the same basic task, swap out WaMu and insert USAA.

Here's what happened.

USAA provides secure messaging through their website for all of their members. In signing up for financial advice, I am given access to a webform that will send secure email to my advisor.

The advisor or the service desk can reply and all their replies are stored on the website, so the content is secure. I am then sent a standard email notifying me that I have a message on the website. Clicking on a link starts the log in procedure and once I log in, I'm routed directly to my secure inbox.

So far, so good.

Here was my problem. I had sent off a request for information to my advisor, and was in a hurry to hear what they had to say. A few hours after I sent my message, I got an email notifying me that there was a response on the USAA website for me.

Ecstatic, I logged in and opened the newest message. I got this:

------
Dear Mr. [murph],
Thank you for turning to USAA for help with your financial needs. We have received your email and have forwarded to your planner, [name]. If you need immediate assistance, please call Financial Planning Services at (877) XXX-XXXX between 7:30 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. CT, Monday - Friday.

Thank you,
USAA

USAA Financial Planning Services is a service mark that refers to the financial planning services and financial advice provided by USAA Financial Planning Services Insurance Agency, Inc. (known as USAA Financial Insurance Agency in California), a registered investment adviser and insurance agency, and its wholly owned subsidiary.
Notification sent to: [email]
------

Needless to say, this message was a bit of a disappointment. No information, nothing really secure here. Just a system generated response that "hey, we got your message."

I decide to tell them about it.

*On the secure message inbox page*

*Scan for 'Contact Us' link, find it in the page footer, click*

*Scan contact information, see 'Email us' link, click*

*Review web form. See that my name, account number have been prefilled, but that I have the option of changing these to my wife's information (in case she was using this log in).*

*Under topic, select 'Feedback,' 'Website,' and 'Suggestion.'*

*Enter a subject, see that the message box allows 8,000 characters, and that I can attach up to thirty files with a size limit of 10MB*

*Enter a suggestion that automatic responses that do not contain secure information be sent via regular email and stored on the website, but that no 'log in to review a new message' email be sent for these messages.*

*Hit submit.*

*Review message and confirm.*

Done.

------

Now, that's more like it – but aside from being able to upload attachments – this is not terribly special. Web forms should work, they should not eat your input when they don't and there's not much else to say.

With most companies, you get a follow up email where some script or service rep thanks you for your input and either 1) attempts to justify what you've experienced; or 2) apologizes and tells you they will try to make things better.

The following morning, I was at home and was called by a USAA rep, who thanked me for telling them about this issue. She apologized and admitted that the current setup had issues. The system was set up to send all messages via the secure site, but she could (if I wanted) disable the automatic responses for my account.

So, net result – I won't get any more false alarms. Works for me.

Done. Customer happy.

Even in the event that there was no solution – I would have gotten a phone call from a rep to get all my feedback to better understand the situation.

I am consistently impressed by how USAA does customer relations – but the more I think about it – the more I realize, they're just doing what I would expect them to do.

Other providers have performed so poorly and for so long - that their lamentable average has begun to seem normal.

USAA's phone experience is a perfect example.

------

*Dial 1-800-531-8222*
Welcome to USAA, please say or enter your USAA number.
*Enter [USAA number]*
I see you're calling from a phone in your profile, so let me look up your accounts.

Which of your accounts are you calling about today?
*Homeowners*
Homeowners. Is this correct?
*Yes*

*Transfer sound*

Service Rep: Good morning, is this Mr. [murph]?

Me: Yes it is.

SR: May I have your phone password?

Me: [password]

SR: Thank you. How can I help you today?

------
I mean, that rocks, but only because everyplace else sucks so hard.

USAA is the only company I've ever called where when I identify myself via the touchpad, and everyone I speak to afterwards knows who I am. Consequently, my USAA number is the only vendor account number that I know from memory. USAA makes it useful. They use it for everything.

It is the claim number for accidents. In my most recent fender bender, I was able to give the other driver the USAA contact info along with a claim number because I knew what it would be. Useful!

This is all great stuff, but it all flows from the fact that these guys have clearly bothered to listen to their customers.

They even cross channel well. Ever tried to send feedback/service requests via a vendor's website and then called in later to ask about it? Nine times out of ten, the phone guys can't see the web stuff, don't understand it, and don't know a way to get you to that information (but they'd be happy to start the process over, on the phone….!).

I never get that with USAA. Make a quote on the website, call in later with more detail, they're on it. They'll update it, and then tell me I can keep updating it via the website if I think of more stuff.

Despite USAA having numerous subsidiaries and internal partitions, I have never been told by a USAA rep to hang up and call another number. Phone transfers are made by people, to people (usually with introductions – "Mr. [murph]? I have Jonathan from Brokerage for you, he's going to take care of you now. You have a good day.")

Home fricking run. But again – they're just doing what their customers want.

It shouldn't be exemplary, but unfortunately – it is.

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Pulling the trigger

For better or worse, we're buying a home.

Given the recent past, it's clearly too early to start filling out change of address forms.

-but we're headed in that direction at least.