Showing posts with label Special Kind of Stupid. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Special Kind of Stupid. Show all posts

Friday, January 29, 2016

Malheur or "Beware the Slighted White Man"



How do you get to this point?

Less than a second after this image was taken, the man in the hat will be fatally shot.

He is 54 years old, married and father of 11 children. And he will be shot down as he stands in the snow, reaching for a 9mm handgun as four law enforcement officers are aiming weapons at him.

What is this man thinking?

I've heard more than a few people react to this as "Good!" or "he got what he deserved," but really - this is a genuine tragedy.

Eleven people call this man 'dad,' yet he chose to illegally occupy federal buildings with a gun. Chose to declare to the national media that "these buildings will never, ever return to the federal government."

When pulled over by authorities, this man - with other people in the car - chose to flee. Risking his own life and the lives of his passenger & those of the officers who had to give chase.

With officers in hot pursuit and a roadblock ahead of his vehicle, this man chose not to slow down, but attempted to drive around it - burying the front of his truck in the snow & missing an officer by a few feet. Again, this man and his passenger could have been injured or killed in the crash. Had the officer in question taken a few more steps before the crash, they might have been seriously injured or killed.

The police could have (justifiably) fired into the truck as it narrowly missed one of their officers. This man or his passenger could have died as a result.

And finally, this man chose to exit their truck & raise their arms, the first sane thing they do in this entire sad affair. They are confronted by five officers in front and one behind. After noticing the officer behind them, the man lowers his hands and puts one into his coat four seconds later.

So the police kill him.

I have a lot of sympathy for this man's family. To watch a family member do what this man did must baffle them. Even steeped in a family mindset, surely they are wondering why didn't he keep his hands up?

And the capstone to this entire thing is that this man died for a cause that was lost before he was even born.

There is no chance that all federal lands in the west are going to become private lands, or even state lands in this century.

This man threw his life away for complete bullsh!t. Bullsh!t he apparently believed above everything else - above even love for his children. That is just sad beyond measure.

Think of how deluded a person would have to be to think that seizing a federal bird sanctuary would cause the federal government to give up federal lands. This is something that can only be done by Congress - a body that has never even brought such a bill to the floor in decades. The same body that can barely muster the energy to raise the debt ceiling - this is the group that is suddenly going to spring into action to appease a small group of malcontents camped out in the middle of frozen nowhere.

Had this man bothered to check the political winds even a little bit - he would have learned that the rest of the nation has no idea that the feds own so much land. The rest of the nation could give a sh!t about federal land ownership and less than a half of a sh!t about people who do.

What's that you say, grandpaw? You're mad at the gubment? Well, get in line.

And I get that western residents have locked horns with the feds over land for ages. Some of their grievances I might have patience to listen to. But the reality is that the federal lands belong to everyone.

And everyone outnumbers the hell out of the few folks out west who want to graze for free. That's democracy - majority rule, with rights for all. And there is no right in the Constitution that says you can use or take federal land just because you're unhappy. Unless you can win over enough people to sway Congress - you're pretty much outta luck.

And guys like this unfortunate father of eleven, were fed up with being out of luck. They will not be ignored....!  

But they are, nobody cares about them - or even thinks about them.

Oh, but they will.... Frustrated and unknown, these folks are gonna get heard. So they grab a gun, all the stuff they own that looks mil-spec and dress up like soldiers of the government they claim to hate.

Because it makes them feel powerful. And they get attention. And their ranks begin to swell.

The gun makes people have to pay attention. Not because they care about the message, but because they are afraid you are going to hurt someone. This laughable nonsense that the guns are there for "defense" is even dumber than the idea that Congress is going to do what they ask.

The militia have guns for defense - in case the cops attack them.

Psst! You in the cowboy hat! I'll let you in on a secret. GUNS ATTRACT COPS.

It's a fact. You go to a public place as an armed group and cops will come to you. Guns are cop catnip, and everybody knows it except these militia idiots. Take the "defense" argument another few steps down the road and you're at the next secret these idiots don't appear to realize: GUNS HAVE NEVER MADE THE COPS GO AWAY.
If you have the weapons, they come to you - but if you SHOOT any of the weapons near the police, you will have attracted the attention of ALL OF THE POLICE. For how long? UNTIL THEY GET YOU.

So, your "defense" argument is stupid from any angle, cowboy-man.

Guns work wonders at getting media attention, though - and if you were smart - you'd find a way to attract the media without the cops.

Militias, being idiots, get both.

Still, when cameras are finally aimed at them - they come to a terrible realization:
They are in no way prepared to make a national statement.

If the Bundys had a brain in their head, they would have vetted a group of committed westerners and presented themselves to the nation in a non-threatening, but extremely public way.

The key to protesting is to make the public identify with you - so they sympathize with you.

Bundy and Co announced their collective Other-hood in 60pt bold. Chest thumping stupidity became their brand. Their ranks were stocked with a mix of those who were committed to the cause and those who needed to be committed to a padded room. Tarps, Fluffy Bunny, sumo guy for God's sake.

With every week, the militia added another star to the "We are Freaks" flag flying over Malheur.

The feds did something smart - perhaps not on purpose - by waiting long enough for these malcontents to become a national joke before they made their move.

I have wondered if the totality of their failure became evident to them before the shooting of this sad man. Such a realization might drive a slighted white man to do something rash.

But I still cannot help but wonder what it was in the mind of LaVoy Finicum that kept him going  - even in the face of overwhelming evidence that his personal cause was lost. Did he really think he could shoot his way out? Did he think his death would change anything?

(LaVoy's ghost - if you're reading this, the answer to that last one is NO.)

And what, in the name of anything held holy would compel a man to desert his children like that?

Don't you even say "Patriotism." That is utter bullsh!t, too. If you love your country, live to make it better, don't die to make yourself feel important.

Father of eleven, dead in a snowbank. A month from now, the nation will have forgotten his name and his cause.

Decades from now his family will still be missing him.

Sad.

Monday, August 15, 2011

FU GSE

(Via CJR)

Remember Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae? They'd be the Government Sponsored Entities who pretty much owned the secondary mortgage market until Wall Street went all Subprime.

It depends on what the definition of "lose" is...

You probably remember that these two companies were bailed out by the government to the tune of billions.
They almost went under because they were criminally under capitalized and couldn't absorb the cost of failing loans.

The Detroit Free Press is reporting that Freddie and Fannie are pressing foreclosures on these bad loans at a startlingly aggressive pace.

Foreclosure is generally agreed on as the worst case for all involved. The homeowner loses their home, the bank takes a home that is worth less than the loan it secured, and the house is unlikely to sell in a depressed and glutted market.

So why do it? Moreover, why fall all over yourself in a rush to do it?

This is why:
For example...if a home with a $200,000 mortgage is foreclosed and Fannie nets $80,000 from its sale, Fannie loses $120,000. But because Congress authorized the Treasury Department to reimburse Fannie as part of the government's takeover, taxpayers eat the losses.
The complete and utter scumbags who run the GSE, aided by those who would have the power to stop them, are hoping to bury the losses with federal funds and then return to their former glory days as a semi-private firm. A firm that presumably would resume paying them handsome salaries once all is forgotten by the public.

Friday, June 17, 2011

Vancouver Pride

Look ma, I'm all growed up!


The National News has the full reel of riot pictures.

Y'know, it's one thing to be an idiot, but it's quite another to be so proud of being an idiot.

Tuesday, May 31, 2011

In Italy, the Age of Consent is 14

This and other appalling facts about Italy can be found in The New Yorker's very thorough rundown of the Burliosconi affair(s)

Yikes.

(H/t The Awl)

Friday, May 27, 2011

Citizen's United Paradox

Love this:
If human beings can make direct campaign contributions... and if, in Citizens United’s interpretation... corporations and human beings are entitled to equal political speech rights, then corporations must also be able to contribute within (the federal) limits.
So... If I go the other direction on this and say either individuals are allowed to make unlimited political donations - or corporations are limited to the individual limits.  Which is it?

Blarrrgh.

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Against the Advice of Counsel

(Via NOLA)
[Isaiah] Doyle, of Harvey, was convicted Thursday of murdering a store clerk during a robbery in Marrero in 2005. The same jury that convicted him of first-degree murder will decide if he should be executed for the crime.

Doyle told the jury that he shot store clerk Hwa Lee four times only because the gun jammed and prevented him shooting her more.
"The only reason she was shot four times is because the gun jammed,'' he said. "Otherwise I would have emptied the gun in her f--- head.''

Later, he told the jury that he would kill them all if he had an AK-47 and pointed to one juror and said he wanted to cut off his head.
I'm picturing this man's attorney as he says this.

Too late for the crazy defense...?

Maneuver and Chase

The battle over the anti-union law (2011 Wisconsin Act 10) continues...

Via the Milwaukee Journal:
Three cases are continuing over the new law, leaving the courts as the final arbiter of whether the law is in effect, whether it was adopted properly and whether aspects of it are constitutional. Huebsch said he would abide by court rulings if he is ordered to stop implementation of the law.

Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne, a Democrat, filed a complaint this month to block the law. He contended that a committee of lawmakers violated the open meetings law when it approved the measure, which was a key step to advancing it to the GOP-controlled Assembly and Senate.

Republicans argue they did not violate the meetings law.

Dane County Circuit Judge Maryann Sumi on March 18 said Ozanne's case was likely to succeed and blocked Democratic Secretary of State Doug La Follette from publishing the law.

But on Friday, the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau - which was not under the court order - published the law.

The director of the reference bureau, Stephen Miller, said Friday that statutes required him to take that step, but that he does not believe the law takes effect until the secretary of state acts.

Last week, the Department of Justice appealed Sumi's temporary restraining order. The appeals court panel said the state Supreme Court should take the case, but the high court hasn't ruled on whether it will take it.

On Monday, the Department of Justice asked to withdraw its appeal, saying the law had now been published. It also asked Sumi to vacate the temporary restraining order, withdraw Tuesday's hearing and dismiss La Follette from the case.

Ozanne, meanwhile, asked Sumi to declare that the reference bureau's actions did not constitute publication of the law under the state constitution and that the bureau is subject to and had violated the restraining order. He further asked the judge to order the reference bureau to remove the act from the Legislature's website.

The WI DoJ's attempt to withdraw its appeal (because it belives the law is in effect and the appeal is moot) was denied (pdf) with the court saying, in effect, "we don't have the right to yank a case away from the WI Supreme Court." As in, sorry, fellas. You asked us to give it to them so we did, we're not taking it away from them because you've changed your mind.

Ozanne's request that the LRB be ordered to "unpublish" Act 10 was denied - with Judge Sumi's proxy saying that the LRB's publication did not change the status quo.

Assuming I'm reading this right, this leaves two pending cases:
  • Ozanne's public meetings violation case before Judge Sumi; and
  • the appeal of Judge Sumi's restraining order sitting on the desk of the WI Supreme Court.

With Judge Sumi's hearing going on right now, it'll be interesting to know if the WI Supreme Court will let this play out before they decide whether or not to step in (it would seem to make sense, but if they believe the restraining order is in error - they might jump in now).

All in all, quite the mess.

(H/t The Wheeler Report)

Late Edit: Today's testimony ended, sounds like there will be an amended restraining order, and testimony will continue on Friday. via @madisoninfo/dcc

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Fukushima Parody

Oh sweet mother of God...


Alternate Headline: Sen. Graham is a media whore



Because, really... what would a nuclear crisis be without Sen. Graham leveraging it for his own visibility?

Tuesday, March 01, 2011

O'Reilly, Fox News: Still Full of It

(H/t to AK)

Oh this is art. O'Reilly runs a clip supposedly from the protests in Wisconsin -

-and it features palm trees.

Seriously.



As a UW alum... I seem to have missed all the palm trees around the capitol building.

Ye Gods.

Whose House Is It?

To watch Wisconsin politics now, you'd think the place had been invaded by aliens. The sedate Midwest lifestyle has degenerated into this
Capitol access was restricted over the weekend and again this morning, following days in which the building had been crowded with protesters. The Wisconsin State Employees Union, along with the AFL-CIO and AFSCME, filed the suit against the state of Wisconsin yesterday. Today, Judge Daniel Moeser ordered the building reopened.
There was a hearing today at 2:15 to sort out the particulars. Haven't heard what the net result was but then there was this bit:
Meanwhile, Dane County Sheriff Dave Mahoney also spoke at the news conference. He addressed questions about the removal of Dane County sheriff's deputies from security around the Capitol.

"We pulled our deputies out of Capitol security yesterday when we determined they were going to limit access to the Capitol. We did not want to serve as 'palace guards' at the Capitol. We are still assisting with security outside the Capitol, making sure protesters stay safe," he said.
Gov. Walker speaks at 4PM Central.

This should be interesting.

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Somebody Ought to Beat His Ass

(Via TPM)

In an apparent bid to out-crazy the gunman, the infamous publicity-whore preacher intends to protest the funeral of nine-year old Tulsa shooting victim, Christina Green.

And other victims as well.

Un-be-effing-lievable.

Monday, October 25, 2010

What is This Man Thinking?


Answer: Not a hell of a lot. I'm pretty sure this guy is certifiably crazy.


But sometimes...crazy is a hell of a thing to watch.

(H/t Danger Room)

Tuesday, October 05, 2010

Frak You, Right Back

If you haven't heard this guy's story - you should.


(From the trailer for Gasland)

But there's a new chapter to this story that's worth telling. One of the offending companies, Cabot Oil & Gas, is being called on the carpet for destroying people's water supply - and they're digging in their heels (emphasis mine).
"We have had people here in Pennsylvania without safe drinking water for nearly two years," said John Hanger, head of Pennsylvania's [Department of Environmental Protection]. "That is totally unacceptable. It is reprehensible. We have given Cabot every opportunity to resolve this matter."

But Cabot has pushed back against the agency, taking out a full-page ad this week in several local newspapers and calling plans to construct the water system "unreasonable, unprecedented ... and unfair."

...

A group of Dimock residents — among them, a former Cabot employee and several residents whose wells had caught fire — filed a lawsuit last year against the company for the contamination and the health risks it could pose to them.

Cabot mentioned the lawsuit in its ad this week, adding that it "does not believe it caused these conditions and intends to fight these allegations through its scientific findings."
(Via ProPublica)

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

Hallowed, My Butt

(via Felix Salmon)

The brilliantly named History Eraser Button blog shows you some of the sights and sounds surrounding our most hallowed ground zero.

Short version: It's only hallowed if strip clubs and bars are now holy.

But see for yourself

Thursday, June 24, 2010

Well, That Would Explain It...

June 1: Al Gore and Tipper Gore announce their impending separation

June 3: A police report is filed in Oregon concluding an investigation into an alleged sexual assault of a massage therapist by Al Gore.

(H/t Pundette)

Late Edit: Here's TPM with more detail.

Tuesday, June 01, 2010

BP's Do-over

The WSJ has a solid graphic about the latest tactic BP is trying on the Deepwater Horizon blowout:


Oh, and the MMS exempted all drilling in the western and central Gulf of Mexico from having to make environmental assessments.

Yes, you heard that right.

(H/t Propublica)

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

History, As Told By Texas and Arizona

Chauncey DeVega posts a what if timeline of US history to showcase the idiocy that is the Texas Education Board.

That's the funny version. The reality would only be amusing if it wasn't going to pass.
[Cynthia Dunbar] is one of a clutch of Christian evangelists and social conservatives who have grasped control of the state's education board. This week they are expected to force through a new curriculum that is likely to shift what millions of American schoolchildren far beyond Texas learn about their history.

The board is to vote on a sweeping purge of alleged liberal bias in Texas school textbooks in favour of what Dunbar says really matters: a belief in America as a nation chosen by God as a beacon to the world, and free enterprise as the cornerstone of liberty and democracy.

...There seems to have been a move away from a patriotic ideology. There seems to be a denial that this was a nation founded under God. We had to go back and make some corrections."
Here's a live blog of the vote of the Texas Education Agency:
And here's a sample of their idiocy:
12:15 – ...The Texas State Board of Education has stricken from the standards references to “capitalism” and “free market” because the board’s right-wingers think “capitalism” is a negative term. The only permitted term for such an economic system will be “free enterprise.” We wouldn’t believe this if we hadn’t just watched it happen. This is so stupid it makes our head hurt.

12:28 – Board member Mavis Knight offers the following amendment: “examine the reasons the Founding Fathers protected religious freedom in America by barring government from promoting or disfavoring any particular religion over all others.” Knight points out that students should understand that the Founders believed religious freedom was so important that they insisted on separation of church and state.

12:32 – Board member Cynthia Dunbar argues that the Founders didn’t intend for separation of church and state in America. And she’s off on a long lecture about why the Founders intended to promote religion. She calls this amendment “not historically accurate.”

12:35 – Knight’s amendment fails on a straight party-line vote, 5-10. Republicans vote no, Democrats vote yes.

12:38 – Let the word go out here: The Texas State Board of Education today refused to require that students learn that the Constitution prevents the U.S. government from promoting one religion over all others. They voted to lie to students by omission.
Here was the amendment again: “examine the reasons the Founding Fathers protected religious freedom in America by barring government from promoting or disfavoring any particular religion over all others.” And this board, on a vote of 10-5, said they don’t want Texas students to learn about this basic protection for the religious freedom of everyone in America.
I have to believe that while it is relatively easy for a deranged group of lunatics to seize control of state agency for a short time - rational thought will push back with a vengeance.

I'm remembering those utter dorkwads from the Dover School district getting the stuffing beaten out of them. So perhaps there's hope.

In the meantime, I'm sure I know what Dr. Plait would say: Texas: Doomed.
(H/t JK)

Monday, April 19, 2010

The Stanford Report - A.K.A. "As the S.E.C. Slept..."

The OIG released its report (PDF) on how the S.E.C. handled the Robert Allen Stanford Ponzi scheme.

As you'd expect with anything involving the S.E.C. - it concludes that mistakes were made. From their conclusion:
The OIG investigation found that the SEC’s Fort Worth office was aware since 1997 that Robert Allen Stanford was likely operating a Ponzi scheme, having come to that conclusion a mere two years after SGC, Stanford’s investment adviser, registered with the SEC in 1995. We found that over the next eight years, the SEC’s Fort Worth Examination group conducted four examinations of Stanford’s operations, finding in each examination that its sale of CDs through SIB could not have been “legitimate,” and that it was “highly unlikely” that the returns Stanford claimed to generate could have been achieved with its purported conservative investment approach. While the Fort Worth Examination group made multiple efforts after each examination to convince Enforcement to open and conduct an investigation of Stanford, no meaningful effort was made by Enforcement to investigate the potential fraud, or to bring an action to attempt to stop it, until late 2005.
I especially appreciate the last part of this paragraph (emphasis added):
Moreover, the OIG investigation found that even at that time, Enforcement missed an opportunity to bring an action against SGC for its admitted failure to conduct any due diligence regarding Stanford’s investment portfolio, which could have potentially completely stopped the sales of the SIB CDs through the SGC investment adviser, and provided investors and prospective investors notice that the SEC considered SGC’s sales of the CDs to be fraudulent. The OIG investigation found that this particular type of action was not considered, partially because the new head of Enforcement in Fort Worth was not apprised of the findings in the investment advisers’ examinations in 1998 and 2002, or even that SGC had registered as an investment adviser, a fact she learned for the first time in the course of this OIG investigation in January 2010.
As in:

"Really, Mr. OIG investigator (who has come to my office to interview me on what I knew about the Stanford Ponzi scheme which blew up a year ago), you're telling me that
my office has the power to regulate SGC as an investment advisor? Wow, I had no idea! We should get on that...

Amazingly, the report goes downhill from there. It details how the culture at S.E.C. enforcement led their regulators to chase stats rather than investigate wrongdoing. Complex cases, or "novel" cases like Standford's Ponzi scheme were thought to be less certain to succeed. Regulators were looking for "slam dunk" cases.

They didn't investigate things like Ponzi schemes - because they though might be hard.

(H/t Felix Salmon)

Monday, April 05, 2010

AIG: the Biggest, Highest-Rated Mark in the World

(Via CJR)

I'm behind on so many things these days, but here's a nice get from CJR on (yet) another reason AIG went under. AIG, you'll remember is the company that covered Wall Street's bets that the housing market would go boom.

AIG essentially was saying "No, I don't think housing will blow up. I'll take that bet."

They insured bonds backed by bad mortgages to the tune of billions, and lost so big that you and I had to pay for it. But here was a nice new wrinkle AIG was covering bets on bonds whose assets could be switched with other assets.

From the Bloomberg article:
Without having to ask AIG’s permission, firms such as TCW, hired to oversee funds called collateralized debt obligations, replaced maturing assets with junk that quickly went bad. Managers including [TCW's] Lou Lucido said they didn’t realize how severe the mortgage crash would be and were called upon by CDO contracts to reinvest. At the same time, buying riskier assets could mean bigger paydays.

"The incentive was perverse," said Michael Lea, a finance professor at San Diego State University and former chief economist at mortgage giant Freddie Mac. "The fee structure encouraged TCW to put lower-rated bonds into CDOs over time."
As in "I'll insure your house, or whatever unknown house you choose to insure in the future. Don't bother notifying me - I'm sure it will be a good risk."

So you have AIG covering bets on the housing market - exposing themselves to huge liabilities over a long period of time AND the stuff they're insuring could be hollowed out and replaced with toxic crap - by cleints who stand to profit immensly by doing so.

Remember how we had to pay bonuses to AIG employees because "otherwise they might leave?"

Christ, AIG should have stopped paying these idiots bonuses years ago.